@article{ART002194504},
author={Kim, Tae-Kyung},
title={Subpersonal States and Non-conceptual Content},
journal={PHILOSOPHY·THOUGHT·CULTURE},
issn={1975-1621},
year={2017},
number={23},
pages={1-27},
doi={10.33639/ptc.2017..23.001}
TY - JOUR
AU - Kim, Tae-Kyung
TI - Subpersonal States and Non-conceptual Content
JO - PHILOSOPHY·THOUGHT·CULTURE
PY - 2017
VL - null
IS - 23
PB - Research Institute for East-West Thought
SP - 1
EP - 27
SN - 1975-1621
AB - Philosophers, who advocate conceptualism on perceptual experience, particularly John McDowell and Bill Brewer, have argued that perceptual experience has conceptual contents because those contents could be engaged with the three major types of conceptual capacities that we have. As such, the notion of experience that the conceptualists hold is conscious state, which allows our conscious access involving the conceptual capacities. Whereas, philosophers called neuro-philosophers, particularly Raftopoulos and Müller recently argue that the contents of experience can be non-conceptual only if they are not cognitively penetrated, otherwise it is conceptual. Hence, the range of experience defined by the neuro-philosophers refers to both conscious and non-conscious states of mind. As such the criterion of having either conceptual contents or non-conceptual contents is dependent on whether a perceptual state is cognitively penetrated.
This paper reveals the initial problem of the non-conceptualism that there is no way to prove the existence of non-conceptual content in subpersonal mental states without considering conceptual cognitive penetration. Non-conceptualists attempt to find that there could be a particular type of perceptual content, which cannot be engaged with a perceiver's conceptual capacity when we consider only subpersonal level of experience in order to prove the existence of non-conceptual content in experience. However, I argue that without being conceptually engaged with, no perceptual content can be found in those lower level of experience.
KW - Conceptualism;Cognitive Penetration;Non-conceptualism;Neurophilosophy;Philosophy of Perception
DO - 10.33639/ptc.2017..23.001
ER -
Kim, Tae-Kyung. (2017). Subpersonal States and Non-conceptual Content. PHILOSOPHY·THOUGHT·CULTURE, 23, 1-27.
Kim, Tae-Kyung. 2017, "Subpersonal States and Non-conceptual Content", PHILOSOPHY·THOUGHT·CULTURE, no.23, pp.1-27. Available from: doi:10.33639/ptc.2017..23.001
Kim, Tae-Kyung "Subpersonal States and Non-conceptual Content" PHILOSOPHY·THOUGHT·CULTURE 23 pp.1-27 (2017) : 1.
Kim, Tae-Kyung. Subpersonal States and Non-conceptual Content. 2017; 23 : 1-27. Available from: doi:10.33639/ptc.2017..23.001
Kim, Tae-Kyung. "Subpersonal States and Non-conceptual Content" PHILOSOPHY·THOUGHT·CULTURE no.23(2017) : 1-27.doi: 10.33639/ptc.2017..23.001
Kim, Tae-Kyung. Subpersonal States and Non-conceptual Content. PHILOSOPHY·THOUGHT·CULTURE, 23, 1-27. doi: 10.33639/ptc.2017..23.001
Kim, Tae-Kyung. Subpersonal States and Non-conceptual Content. PHILOSOPHY·THOUGHT·CULTURE. 2017; 23 1-27. doi: 10.33639/ptc.2017..23.001
Kim, Tae-Kyung. Subpersonal States and Non-conceptual Content. 2017; 23 : 1-27. Available from: doi:10.33639/ptc.2017..23.001
Kim, Tae-Kyung. "Subpersonal States and Non-conceptual Content" PHILOSOPHY·THOUGHT·CULTURE no.23(2017) : 1-27.doi: 10.33639/ptc.2017..23.001