2017, Vol., No.23

Subpersonal States and Non-conceptual Content

Kim, Tae-Kyung | 2017, (23) | pp.1~27 | number of Cited : 4

PDF

Pufendorf’s Theory of Moral Duties in Natural Law Ethics - An Interpretative Study of Pufendorf’s On the Duty of Man and Citizen According to Natural Law -

Cho,Kwan-Sung | 2017, (23) | pp.28~63 | number of Cited : 2

PDF

A Study on the Development of Confucianism in Korea and China and its Effects on Education

kim yeonji , Han, Yong Su | 2017, (23) | pp.64~84 | number of Cited : 2

PDF

Decadence of national schools during the Warring States period in ancient China did not lead to reach a plateau of developments in education. Rather, private schools grew all over the country and created a new history in education. Although 'who' started and 'when' the private school began during the Warring States period in ancient China was not completely proven, Confucianism, Moheism, Legalism, and Daoism were the most influential and widely known ideas. Confucius, Mencius, and Xuncius were the representative men in Confucianism. As the teachings of Confucianism ‘Confucianism’ distinct from other religions is distinguished by learning. Confucianism is said to have started from Confucius and took root for a long time. Furthermore, it has influenced other countries. the educational ideology of Confucianism was very specific and structured since it was concerned with the social function of education as well as the personal development. Confucianism was East Asians' philosophy of living and represented East Asia’s thoughts, and Korea was no exception. In the case of Korea, Confucianism influenced Toegye Yi Hwang, Yulgok Yii’s Neo-Confucianism, and Jeoung Yahg-yong’s Shilhak during the Joseon Dynasty period. During the Joseon Dynasty, Confucianism was regarded as a political ideology and it served as a guide for scholars. The current education in Korea has the historical background, therefore understanding the current education and development of the future education is proceeded from understanding the education in the past. Compared to the studies on Confucianism regarding ideology, concept and terminology, the comparative study between Confucian scholars and the study on the development of Confucianism affecting education and its effects in China and Korea education system are lacking. This inquiry compares the developments of Confucianism in Korea and China and its effects on education. Also, this study discovers the meaning of Confucianism in current education.

Revival of Confucianism and Reasons for Application of Harmony Ideology to Solve Problems in Multicultural Communities in China

CHO YE SHIN , Kim, Jin Yeol | 2017, (23) | pp.85~107 | number of Cited : 3

PDF

The Population Problem in Ecocentric Ethics

Kim Hak-taek | 2017, (23) | pp.108~127 | number of Cited : 2

PDF

Religiosity in the I-Ching and Its Modern Significance

신성수 | 2017, (23) | pp.128~152 | number of Cited : 1

PDF

An Examination of the Significance of Praxagora’s Political Program in Aristophanes’ The Assemblywomen(Ecclesiazusae 571-710)

Rhim, Sung-Chul , 권현숙 | 2017, (23) | pp.153~176 | number of Cited : 6

PDF

A Study on The Relationship between Corporate Purpose and CSR - A Necessity for Change in Corporate Governance for Distribution Justice -

WOONHYUK JANG | 2017, (23) | pp.176~215 | number of Cited : 5

PDF

In this paper, I point out the following: 1) the purpose of a corporation lies in the fair distribution of profit to all stakeholders, including shareholders and 2) it is the ultimate responsibility of the corporation to do so. It is called Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). As an economic institution, a corporation has a responsibility to produce goods and services efficiently and to distribute the profit fairly to the members who have contributed and cooperated in the production. I define this responsibility as the principle of production cooperation. CSR can be characterized by the differences between two theories of corporate governance - shareholder theory and stakeholder theory. According to the shareholder theory, the CEO has the primary res-ponsibility of maximizing the interests of shareholders, so CSR should be considered to be a means to fulfill shareholder interests. On the other hand, according to the stakeholder theory, firms should be managed in the balanced interests of all stakeholder groups, including shareholders, employees, suppliers, the local community, and so on. Stakeholder theory coincides with the corporate institutional purpose and the principle of production cooperation. Therefore, in order to fully realize CSR, it is justified for corporate governance to be changed from shareholder theory to stakeholder theory. Then, the corporate governance that allows stakeholders to receive as much distribution as they contribute to corporate performance becomes ‘stakeholder democracy.’ Through stakeholder democracy, stakeholders have a right to participate in the composition of the board. What is expected of this corporate governance is that the board of directors can decide on the rationality to meet the interests of each stakeholder group and on the reasonability in which all stakeholders consent that it is a fair distribution. That is to say, the efficiency of production and the fairness of distribution are the ultimate purpose of the enterprise. Stakeholder democracy provides a justified background governance structure in which corporations can fulfill their responsibilities.

The Knowledge's Consistency and Mutualistic Consilience - Toward a Mutualism between the Humanities and the Sciences -

Joonghwan Jeon | 2017, (23) | pp.216~240 | number of Cited : 5