본문 바로가기
  • Home

Correcting Cost Bias in Hazardous Chemical Choice : A Policy-Linked Multi-Attribute Analysis

  • Industry Promotion Research
  • Abbr : IPR
  • 2026, 11(1), pp.121~126
  • DOI : 10.21186/IPR.2026.11.1.121
  • Publisher : Industrial Promotion Institute
  • Research Area : Interdisciplinary Studies > Interdisciplinary Research
  • Received : December 9, 2025
  • Accepted : December 19, 2025
  • Published : January 31, 2026

Kyoung-Hee Noh 1 Gyu-Sun Cho 1

1호서대학교

Accredited

ABSTRACT

This study develops a policy-linked multi-attribute framework to correct cost-centric bias in hazardous chemical choice. Three solvents (TCE, DCM, DPM) are normalized on Safety (S), Economics (E), and Substitutability (M) to [0–1], evaluated under five policy-anchored weighting sets (A–E), and analyzed via a global sensitivity sweep. Calculations were implemented in Python 3.11/NumPy 1.26. DPM ranks first under safety-weighted and balanced scenarios (A–C), while DCM becomes first only in the cost-dominant scenario (E). With w_S = w_M = (1 − w_E)/2, the tie threshold between DCM and DPM is w_E* = 0.3399; it shifts to 0.3916 with −20% on DCM’s economics and to 0.3174 with −0.1 on DPM’s safety. These outputs are model results standardized from literature inputs interpretation is bounded by the selected indicators and assumptions. Policy levers—toxicity thresholds, hazard-grade-linked charges/insurance /liability, mandatory alternatives analysis, and enhanced disclosure—are recommended.

Citation status

* References for papers published after 2024 are currently being built.