본문 바로가기
  • Home

International Relations as an American Social Science and Academic Freedom: A Need for an Expansion of Research Programmes and the Discussion of Taboo Subjects in International Relations

Yang Chun Hee 1

1경희대학교

Accredited

ABSTRACT

A revisionist historian Howard Zinn once said that “you can’t be neutral on a moving train.” If you remain silent on a moving train that means you are already agreeing with the speed and the destination of the train. There isn’t anybody who is not aware that the study of international relations has been an American social science; and yet, nothing serious has been done to change the pattern. If IR scholars remain silent doing exactly what the mainstream IR community requires them to do, that would be like pretending to be neutral on a moving train. This article suggests that the positivist and realist paradigms, which have dominated the field of international relations for the past forty years, might have been working as the most effective tools to serve the rich and powerful by ‘legitimately’ silencing the dissenting voices of the existing world. This article maintains that IR scholars should study not only topics like democratic peace, hegemonic stability theory, clash of civilizations etc. but also taboo subjects like the military-industrial complex, the Bilderberg Group, the Council on Foreign Relations, Jewish lobby, the wall street, the Rothschild, 9/11, and even UFO. Given our academic freedom, we might be able to discover some amazing hidden power structures of the world.

Citation status

* References for papers published after 2023 are currently being built.