@article{ART001972355},
author={Kim, Ki Wook and Park Hyun-Gook},
title={A Comparative study on the commentary of Yang Shang Shan(楊上善) and Wang Bing(王冰)'s Medical Though (Ⅱ)},
journal={The Journal Of Korean Medical Classics},
issn={1229-8328},
year={2001},
volume={14},
number={2},
pages={138-174}
TY - JOUR
AU - Kim, Ki Wook
AU - Park Hyun-Gook
TI - A Comparative study on the commentary of Yang Shang Shan(楊上善) and Wang Bing(王冰)'s Medical Though (Ⅱ)
JO - The Journal Of Korean Medical Classics
PY - 2001
VL - 14
IS - 2
PB - 대한한의학원전학회
SP - 138
EP - 174
SN - 1229-8328
AB - This dissertation examines methods and contents of the annotations for 'Huang Di Nei Jing'(『黃帝內經』)' and compares annotations for the 'Huang Di Nei Jing' by 'Yang Shang Shan(楊上善)' with those by 'Wang Bing(王冰)'. It is accomplished in terms of the two comparative examinations laying stress on the cosmic dual forces, the Five Elements, the four seasons, Taoism, the internal organs, and organic diseases based on the medicine of internal meridian. The results are characterized as follows: Generally about 'Ming Men Xue Shuo(命門學說)', it was concentrated on the theory of the 'Ming(明)' and the 'Qing(淸)' dynasty except 'Nan Jing(『難經』)' and it was lacking in the theory of 'JinㆍTang(晋ㆍ唐)'. It was said that 'Ming Men(命門)' is eyes in 'Ling ShuㆍGen Jie(『靈樞ㆍ根結』)', while it was said that the left one of the kidney is kidney and the right one is 'Ming Men' in 'Nan Jing'. So there was a heated controversy. But according to 'Yang Shang Shan', he combined the two theories into one in such way that he asserted that kidneys are eyes and eyes are 'Ming Men'. He also asserted that stomach was the source of living activity. He deepened and developed the meaning of 'Wei Qi(胃氣)' in 'Nei Jing', and made a theoretical foundation for posterity. Therefore he made the theory of 'Nei Jing' logical, systematic, and practical. 'Wang Bing' rejected the hermit in Taoism. He got out of mysterious things and turned toward reality. His annotations had a great influence on many of the scholars who studied 'Huang Di Nei Jing'. So he had a greater influence of clinical medicine. 'Wang Bing' deeply did research in the theory of viscera. He understood very well how important the vitality of the five viscera is in order to study the process of the diseases of viscera, because the physiological effect of the five viscera is changed according to the difference of 'BonZhangZiKi(本臟之氣)'. He suggested that 'ChenGye(天癸)' was a product combined with 'GyeSu(癸水)' and 'ChenJinZiKi(天眞之氣)' and that vitality and gloominess were the index of growth and maturity of the living creature. He also asserted 'KiKyungPalMac(奇經八脈)'. One of 'KiKyungPalMac', 'ChoungImMac(衝任脈)', managed the growth of living creature and living creatures can live by the flourishing vitality of kidney and the circulation of 'ChoungImMac' 'Wang Bing' explained that stomach worked in the 'ZhongCho(中焦)' and kidney was related to 'HaCho(下焦)'. And he interpreted 'ShinZhenBulHui(神轉不回)' in connection with 'SaSiOHang(四時五行)', 'Sin(神)' was the delicate activity of life, and The meaning of 'Zhen(轉)' is working continuously, so the existing state of a living creature was manifested by 'Zhen'. He worked relating the nature with the human spatiotemporal. 'Wang Bing' classified the causes and the processes of a disease into four 'NeYouSoSheng(內有所成)', 'WeiYouSoSheng(外有所成)', 'ByengShengWuNei(病生于內)', 'ByengShengWuWei(病生于外)'. This classification had great influence on posterity and was connected with 'San Yin Xue Shuo(三因學說)'. He is the first man who had a different opinion of the diseases by coldness and fever. He asserted that the process of the diseases by coldness and fever took a few days after contracting a new discase and that it is different from the a febrile disease by 'BokSa(伏邪)', 'Wang Bing' emphasized that the diseases of kidney resulted from the deficiency of blood, although old physicians, who were concerned with heart, liver, and lungs, thought that the process of the deficiency of blood was not related to kidney. So far, I have comparatively examined medical ideas between 'Yang Shang Shan's annotations for 'Huang Di Nei Jing Tai Su' and Wang Bing's annotations for 'Huang Di Nei Jin Su Wen'. This study has some difficulty approaching what the two medical practitioners intended to do because the times when they lived are very far from today. But it is worth studying their medical ideas because both of them were p
KW - Huang Di Nei Jing Tai Su;Chong Guan Bu Zha Huang Di Nei Jing;'Yang Shang Shan';'Wang Bing';Comparative study;Medical Though;『黃帝內經太素』;『重廣補註黃帝內經』;楊上善;王冰
DO -
UR -
ER -
Kim, Ki Wook and Park Hyun-Gook. (2001). A Comparative study on the commentary of Yang Shang Shan(楊上善) and Wang Bing(王冰)'s Medical Though (Ⅱ). The Journal Of Korean Medical Classics, 14(2), 138-174.
Kim, Ki Wook and Park Hyun-Gook. 2001, "A Comparative study on the commentary of Yang Shang Shan(楊上善) and Wang Bing(王冰)'s Medical Though (Ⅱ)", The Journal Of Korean Medical Classics, vol.14, no.2 pp.138-174.
Kim, Ki Wook, Park Hyun-Gook "A Comparative study on the commentary of Yang Shang Shan(楊上善) and Wang Bing(王冰)'s Medical Though (Ⅱ)" The Journal Of Korean Medical Classics 14.2 pp.138-174 (2001) : 138.
Kim, Ki Wook, Park Hyun-Gook. A Comparative study on the commentary of Yang Shang Shan(楊上善) and Wang Bing(王冰)'s Medical Though (Ⅱ). 2001; 14(2), 138-174.
Kim, Ki Wook and Park Hyun-Gook. "A Comparative study on the commentary of Yang Shang Shan(楊上善) and Wang Bing(王冰)'s Medical Though (Ⅱ)" The Journal Of Korean Medical Classics 14, no.2 (2001) : 138-174.
Kim, Ki Wook; Park Hyun-Gook. A Comparative study on the commentary of Yang Shang Shan(楊上善) and Wang Bing(王冰)'s Medical Though (Ⅱ). The Journal Of Korean Medical Classics, 14(2), 138-174.
Kim, Ki Wook; Park Hyun-Gook. A Comparative study on the commentary of Yang Shang Shan(楊上善) and Wang Bing(王冰)'s Medical Though (Ⅱ). The Journal Of Korean Medical Classics. 2001; 14(2) 138-174.
Kim, Ki Wook, Park Hyun-Gook. A Comparative study on the commentary of Yang Shang Shan(楊上善) and Wang Bing(王冰)'s Medical Though (Ⅱ). 2001; 14(2), 138-174.
Kim, Ki Wook and Park Hyun-Gook. "A Comparative study on the commentary of Yang Shang Shan(楊上善) and Wang Bing(王冰)'s Medical Though (Ⅱ)" The Journal Of Korean Medical Classics 14, no.2 (2001) : 138-174.
