본문 바로가기
  • Home

Comparative Analysis of ESG Rating for SMEs: evidence from China and Korea

  • Journal of The Korea Society of Computer and Information
  • Abbr : JKSCI
  • 2026, 31(6), pp.221~230
  • Publisher : The Korean Society Of Computer And Information
  • Research Area : Engineering > Computer Science
  • Received : April 27, 2026
  • Accepted : May 21, 2026
  • Published : June 30, 2026

Zhuo Li 1

1수원대학교

Accredited

ABSTRACT

This study conducts a comparative analysis of ESG rating systems for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in China and Korea by integrating three analytical dimensions: indicator overlap, attribute consistency, and evaluation processes. The findings reveal an overall divergence between two systems, although partial convergence is observed in the environmental domain. At the attribute level, significant gaps are identified in alignment with the Global Reporting Initiative and SME applicability. Furthermore, comparative analysis of evaluation processes shows that differences between two countries are not merely technical variations, but reflect deeper institutional and governance structures. These results provide new evidence on the structural difference of ESG rating divergence in a cross-national context. The study also offers policy implications for improving the global comparability of ESG frameworks and enhancing the applicability of ESG evaluation systems for SMEs.

Citation status

* References for papers published after 2024 are currently being built.