KJCKorea
Journal Central

@article{ART001787907},
author={Ho-Keun Yi},
title={The polarization of labour market and social integration‑social integrative law & institutions and labour market policy},
journal={Korea Social Policy Review},
issn={1226-0525},
year={2013},
volume={20},
number={2},
pages={261-304},
doi={10.17000/kspr.20.2.201306.261}

TY - JOUR
AU - Ho-Keun Yi
TI - The polarization of labour market and social integration‑social integrative law & institutions and labour market policy
JO - Korea Social Policy Review
PY - 2013
VL - 20
IS - 2
PB - Korean Association of Social Policy
SP - 261
EP - 304
SN - 1226-0525
AB - This article is aiming intensively to analyze the polarizing tendency of labour market and social integration. The polarization of labour market is being regarded as one of the hottest issues not less important than those problems of economic growth, employment, income distribution and national security etc. in the national policy. In this article, we will first follow up the important phenomena of labour market polarization and the background as well as its consequence. Especially, it asks if the present labour policy in the new government which is now being concentrated on the improvement of employment rate(from the present 63% to the 70% in the future) could deserve to diminish the polarization of labour market in korea. At one side, this article makes the special attention on the diversifying tendency of labour market and the various phenomena of fragmentation and segmentation in the labour market according to the forms and types of employment and according to the employee’s status as much as the company’s size. At the other side, it emphasizes that to overcome the polarization of labour market should require the wide reform from the legal measure to the improvement of the wage system, and the qualification system and the social investment as well as the human resource development. Furthermore, this article stresses the importance of integrative approach between the active market policy and the social policy instead of choosing each policy option, seperatively.
KW - labour market polarization;social integration;employment rate;wage system;active labour market policy;social policy
DO - 10.17000/kspr.20.2.201306.261
ER -

Ho-Keun Yi. (2013). The polarization of labour market and social integration‑social integrative law & institutions and labour market policy. Korea Social Policy Review, 20(2), 261-304.

Ho-Keun Yi. 2013, "The polarization of labour market and social integration‑social integrative law & institutions and labour market policy", Korea Social Policy Review, vol.20, no.2 pp.261-304. Available from: doi:10.17000/kspr.20.2.201306.261

Ho-Keun Yi "The polarization of labour market and social integration‑social integrative law & institutions and labour market policy" Korea Social Policy Review 20.2 pp.261-304 (2013) : 261.

Ho-Keun Yi. The polarization of labour market and social integration‑social integrative law & institutions and labour market policy. 2013; 20(2), 261-304. Available from: doi:10.17000/kspr.20.2.201306.261

Ho-Keun Yi. "The polarization of labour market and social integration‑social integrative law & institutions and labour market policy" Korea Social Policy Review 20, no.2 (2013) : 261-304.doi: 10.17000/kspr.20.2.201306.261

Ho-Keun Yi. The polarization of labour market and social integration‑social integrative law & institutions and labour market policy. Korea Social Policy Review, 20(2), 261-304. doi: 10.17000/kspr.20.2.201306.261

Ho-Keun Yi. The polarization of labour market and social integration‑social integrative law & institutions and labour market policy. Korea Social Policy Review. 2013; 20(2) 261-304. doi: 10.17000/kspr.20.2.201306.261

Ho-Keun Yi. The polarization of labour market and social integration‑social integrative law & institutions and labour market policy. 2013; 20(2), 261-304. Available from: doi:10.17000/kspr.20.2.201306.261

Ho-Keun Yi. "The polarization of labour market and social integration‑social integrative law & institutions and labour market policy" Korea Social Policy Review 20, no.2 (2013) : 261-304.doi: 10.17000/kspr.20.2.201306.261