This study examines the classic Korean novel Hanhu-ryong-jeon to trace the process through which two disabled protagonists expand the boundaries of their existence through their material specificity and transform into heroic subjects through the material entanglement of their bodies. Contrasting with existing scholarship that has conventionally interpreted this work as a “narrative of overcoming disability” focused on resolving physical deficiency, this paper re-evaluates the literary value of disabled bodies by highlighting the “relational collaboration” and “active agency” manifested through their somatic interactions. To this end, the process of heroism formation through relational collaboration is analyzed across four distinct stages.
First, in the stage of mutually complementary combination, the study examines how the blind Han Hu-ryong and the paralyzed Im Heo-yeong compensate for each other’s physical limitations, transforming into a new agential subject that merges “seeing eyes” with “walking legs.” Second, in the stage of active realization, the paper demonstrates that their subduing of a tiger and acquisition of gold are not accidental windfalls, but rather the fruits of rigorous somatic and ethical collaboration. Third, in the stage of the expansion of social values, the study analyzes how the broadening of their relational network through material almsgiving (jaebosi) lays the foundation for bodily recovery, thereby deriving the significance of the body functioning within relationships, independent of disability status. Fourth, in the stage of the spatial rite of passage, the paper verifies the process through which the protagonists acquire material and transcendent authority via the threshold of the “tomb,” ultimately being recognized as heroic subjects tasked with public missions.
Based on this analysis, the significance of this study is twofold. First, it captures the dual gaze surrounding disabled bodies. While realistically depicting the discriminatory gaze of the family and society, the text subverts contemporary limitations by underscoring the relational dynamics and agency of disabled bodies through the protagonists' journey. Second, it highlights the emergence of a hero through relational collaboration. Even after recovering their physical health and becoming “whole individuals (wanin),” the protagonists in Hanhu-ryong-jeon continue to perform their heroic tasks jointly from beginning to end. This demonstrates that heroism is achieved not through an individual’s extraordinary brilliance, but through “relational solidarity.” In conclusion, by treating the disabled body not as a mere defect but as a foundation for solidarity, and by depicting the co-performance of heroism through relational collaboration, Hanhu-ryong-jeon departs from the conventional tropes of heroic novels and presents a new paradigm of heroism, thereby holding significant literary-historical value.