Jury Trial and Hearsay Rule (배심재판과 전문법칙)

Kim, Jong Goo (김종구)

Jury Trial and Hearsay Rule

Legal Theory & Practice Review
Abbr : LTPR
2018, 6(1), pp.117-138
Publisher : The Korea Society for Legal Theory and Practice Inc.
Research Area : Social Science > Law

Kim, Jong Goo ¹

¹조선대학교

Candidate

ABSTRACT

This study focuses on the relationship between jury trial and hearsay rule. The Korean Criminal Procedure Act adopted provisions for cross-examination and hearsay rule in 1961. Hearsay rule is one of the important elements of the adversary system. In addition, Anglo-American evidence law, including hearsay rule, is a child of a Jury system. Historically, Anglo-American evidence law became necessary because there were lay jurors as fact-finders. Historically, the jury system and the adversary system have been bases for hearsay rule. The important rationale for hearsay rule is that the declarant cannot be examined. Therefore, we need to promote the adversary trial and the cross-examination for the future form of Korean style hearsay rule in the citizen participation trial. The goal of this study is directed at looking for a desirable form of future Korean style hearsay rule in the citizen participation trial.

KEYWORDS

Jury Trial, Hearsay Rule, Right to Crosss Examination, Right to Confrontation, Public Participation Trial.

Citation status

* References for papers published after 2023 are currently being built.

[journal] 김형만 / 2012 / 현행 일본 형사소송법 중 증거법의 제정과정과 해석 / 형사법의 신동향 / 대검찰청 검찰미래기획단

[journal] 김희균 / 2009 / The Right of Confrontation in Jury Trial / 서울대학교 법학 / 법학연구소 50(4) : 251~272

[journal] 김희균 / 2005 / Crawford: Right of Confrontation Rediscovered / 법조 / 법조협회 54(7) : 145~170

[journal] 신양균 / 2004 / Criminal Trial in a Desirable Direction / 저스티스 / 한국법학원 (78) : 126~141

[journal] 이완규 / 2005 / The Confusion of the Notion of the Trial Priority Principle in Korea and an Attempt to solve the Problem / 법조 / 법조협회 54(6) : 19~62

[book] 이재상 / 2017 / 형사소송법 / 박영사

[journal] 조광훈 / 2006 / 공판중심주의의 올바른 논의 방향에 대한 제언 / 사법행정 / 한국사법행정학회 47(11)

[journal] 春日勉 / 2011 / Practice Phenomenon and Task on Exceptional Application of Hearsay Rule in Japan / 법학논총 / 법학연구원 18(3) : 519~537

[journal] 한성훈 / 2016 / A Study of The methods for Activation of Jury Trial System in Korea / 한양법학 / 한양법학회 27(2) : 67~83

[book] Arthur Best / 2007 / Evidence / Wolters Kluwer

[journal] David H. Taylor / 2011 / Hearsay and the Right of Confrontation in American Trials by Jury / 법학논총 / 법학연구원 18(3) : 483~518

[journal] Deborah Tuerkheimer / 2014 / Confrontation and the Re-Privatization of Domestic Violence / Mich. L. Rev. First Impressions 113 : 32~

[journal] Erin M. Harley / 2007 / Hindsight Bias In Legal Decision Making / Social Cognition / The Hindsight Bias 25

[journal] Jerry Shaw / 1995 / Effects of prohibitive and informative judicial instructions on jury decision making / Social Behavior and Personality 23

[book] John H. Langbein / 2005 / The Origins of Adversary Criminal Trial / Oxford University Press

[book] Jon R. Waltz / 2004 / Evidence / Foundation Press

[journal] Marc D. / 2013 / The Confrontation Clause and Forensic Autopsy Reports-A" Testimonial" / La. L. Rev 74

[journal] Mark Dwyer / 2006 / Crawford's Testimonial Hearsay Category - A Plain Limit on the Protections of the Confrontation Clause / Brook. L. Rev 71 : 275~

[book] Paul C. Giannelli / 2006 / Understanding Evidence / LexisNexis

[book] Wilhelm Roehl / 2005 / History of Law in Japan Since 1868 / Brill

[journal] 渡辺咲子 / 2004 / 現行刑事訴訟法の専門法則に關する規定に制定經緯のついて / 明治学院大学法律科学硏究所年報 (20)

KJCKorea
Journal Central

Legal Theory & Practice Review 2023 KCI Impact Factor : 1.03