KJCKorea
Journal Central

@article{ART002382802},
author={Kim Seung Rae},
title={The acquisition of Air Rights by the normalization of Drones and the scope of the Effect of Land Ownership},
journal={Legal Theory & Practice Review},
issn={2288-1840},
year={2018},
volume={6},
number={3},
pages={137-174}

TY - JOUR
AU - Kim Seung Rae
TI - The acquisition of Air Rights by the normalization of Drones and the scope of the Effect of Land Ownership
JO - Legal Theory & Practice Review
PY - 2018
VL - 6
IS - 3
PB - The Korea Society for Legal Theory and Practice Inc.
SP - 137
EP - 174
SN - 2288-1840
AB - In the modern society, the expansion of land use due to the increase of population and the development of science and technology is caused by the physical shortage of land coming from the limited resources of the land and the economical factor Land shortage problem. As a means to overcome the shortage of land due to such urbanization, the problem of using the land in a three - dimensional way is raised and the problem of intensification of land use is raised. Therefore, the necessity of the development for securing the public space and the underground space of the land is emerging, and the legal scope of the land ownership and the establishment of the jurisprudence about the public land becomes the important legal task. The debate about the 'Fourth Industrial Revolution', which is hotly debated in our society, is affecting all industrial sectors and is emerging as one of the most important research tasks of national industrial policy. As one of the core technologies that will lead the fourth industry, drone is attracting attention and it is entering the commercialization stage. Drones' representative UAV market is no longer a future market. According to Gartner, a technology forecasting specialist, the global drones market last year exceeded $ 4.5 billion in sales and sold 2.15 million units. As the drones become commercially available, many technical improvements have been made, and many legal issues regarding the operation of drones are being raised. The purpose of this study is to examine the policy direction of drones in each country as a premise for examining the legal problems caused by the commercialization of drones, to examine the use of land by the drone as an unmanned flying object, As a basic right, we examined the scope of the land ownership and discussions on the controlled airspace in aviation law.
KW - drones;land ownership;air rights;4th industrial revolution;three-dimensional application of land;scope of ownership;Aviation safety law.
DO -
UR -
ER -

Kim Seung Rae. (2018). The acquisition of Air Rights by the normalization of Drones and the scope of the Effect of Land Ownership. Legal Theory & Practice Review, 6(3), 137-174.

Kim Seung Rae. 2018, "The acquisition of Air Rights by the normalization of Drones and the scope of the Effect of Land Ownership", Legal Theory & Practice Review, vol.6, no.3 pp.137-174.

Kim Seung Rae "The acquisition of Air Rights by the normalization of Drones and the scope of the Effect of Land Ownership" Legal Theory & Practice Review 6.3 pp.137-174 (2018) : 137.

Kim Seung Rae. The acquisition of Air Rights by the normalization of Drones and the scope of the Effect of Land Ownership. 2018; 6(3), 137-174.

Kim Seung Rae. "The acquisition of Air Rights by the normalization of Drones and the scope of the Effect of Land Ownership" Legal Theory & Practice Review 6, no.3 (2018) : 137-174.

Kim Seung Rae. The acquisition of Air Rights by the normalization of Drones and the scope of the Effect of Land Ownership. Legal Theory & Practice Review, 6(3), 137-174.

Kim Seung Rae. The acquisition of Air Rights by the normalization of Drones and the scope of the Effect of Land Ownership. Legal Theory & Practice Review. 2018; 6(3) 137-174.

Kim Seung Rae. The acquisition of Air Rights by the normalization of Drones and the scope of the Effect of Land Ownership. 2018; 6(3), 137-174.

Kim Seung Rae. "The acquisition of Air Rights by the normalization of Drones and the scope of the Effect of Land Ownership" Legal Theory & Practice Review 6, no.3 (2018) : 137-174.