@article{ART002382812},
author={Oh, JungYong and 김성은},
title={Limitations to judicial dispute resolution and collaborative research between law and psychology},
journal={Legal Theory & Practice Review},
issn={2288-1840},
year={2018},
volume={6},
number={3},
pages={327-344}
TY - JOUR
AU - Oh, JungYong
AU - 김성은
TI - Limitations to judicial dispute resolution and collaborative research between law and psychology
JO - Legal Theory & Practice Review
PY - 2018
VL - 6
IS - 3
PB - The Korea Society for Legal Theory and Practice Inc.
SP - 327
EP - 344
SN - 2288-1840
AB - The main areas of collaborative research between the fields of law and psychology are within criminal law, and the primary focus is upon witness memory, testimony, statements, mental emotions and sexual abuse. In recent years, proposals have been made for an expansion of this collaborative field to include civil law, in order to deal with sensitive issues such as divorce settlements involving minors, and legal limitation periods in child sex abuse cases. Judicial resolution is based on rights and obligations, however the current judicial system is only required to present a solution to legal conflict. Whether or not the dispute is resolved in reality is a matter for the parties to solve afterwards on their own terms. So while a dispute could be said to be ended by judicial resolution from a legal point of view, human relations between parties can remain unsettled. If a victim’s psychological conflicts are not fully overcome, or a perpetrator has not fully realised their guilt, dispute still remains. Therefore, interpersonal disputes need to involve not only a legal approach, but a psychological one in order to achieve a more complete resolution.
KW - law and psychology;judicial dispute resolution; Limitations to judicial; sex abuse interpersonal disputes;criminal law;family law.
DO -
UR -
ER -
Oh, JungYong and 김성은. (2018). Limitations to judicial dispute resolution and collaborative research between law and psychology. Legal Theory & Practice Review, 6(3), 327-344.
Oh, JungYong and 김성은. 2018, "Limitations to judicial dispute resolution and collaborative research between law and psychology", Legal Theory & Practice Review, vol.6, no.3 pp.327-344.
Oh, JungYong, 김성은 "Limitations to judicial dispute resolution and collaborative research between law and psychology" Legal Theory & Practice Review 6.3 pp.327-344 (2018) : 327.
Oh, JungYong, 김성은. Limitations to judicial dispute resolution and collaborative research between law and psychology. 2018; 6(3), 327-344.
Oh, JungYong and 김성은. "Limitations to judicial dispute resolution and collaborative research between law and psychology" Legal Theory & Practice Review 6, no.3 (2018) : 327-344.
Oh, JungYong; 김성은. Limitations to judicial dispute resolution and collaborative research between law and psychology. Legal Theory & Practice Review, 6(3), 327-344.
Oh, JungYong; 김성은. Limitations to judicial dispute resolution and collaborative research between law and psychology. Legal Theory & Practice Review. 2018; 6(3) 327-344.
Oh, JungYong, 김성은. Limitations to judicial dispute resolution and collaborative research between law and psychology. 2018; 6(3), 327-344.
Oh, JungYong and 김성은. "Limitations to judicial dispute resolution and collaborative research between law and psychology" Legal Theory & Practice Review 6, no.3 (2018) : 327-344.
