@article{ART002655604},
author={Kim, Dong-Ok},
title={The Purpose of Legislation of Real Estate Right of First Refusal System and its Preservation in Civil Enforcement Practice},
journal={Legal Theory & Practice Review},
issn={2288-1840},
year={2020},
volume={8},
number={1},
pages={345-370}
TY - JOUR
AU - Kim, Dong-Ok
TI - The Purpose of Legislation of Real Estate Right of First Refusal System and its Preservation in Civil Enforcement Practice
JO - Legal Theory & Practice Review
PY - 2020
VL - 8
IS - 1
PB - The Korea Society for Legal Theory and Practice Inc.
SP - 345
EP - 370
SN - 2288-1840
AB - In this paper, I reviewed the Right of First Refusal system, which has been settled as our own system. In the meantime, the problems that have been derived will need to be resolved and further improved and preserved and developed into our unique ‘priority purchase system,’ which creates and captures the desirable wave of social change by examining our traditional values, backgrounds, and ethics and moral laws. The abolition of the system as an alternative is an objection.
If it can be added to the legislative improvement opinion, the legal provisions should be specified by separating and enumerating the concept of ‘special sharing relationship’ as the object of the current preferred bidder. Then, the rest of course becomes ‘general sharing relationship,’ which is based on the general sale process.
In other words, the scope of the application is limited to “sharing couples, sharing denominations, sharing inheritances,” etc., with sharer relationships that are particularly safeguarded.
On the other hand, it is also desirable to expand the protection targets for “community of rural and rural communities and socially communal property” (together and coalition), but more discussion will be needed. In the end, it is a legal system that breathes the times, and it is necessary to make its original good legislative purpose and to make legislative functions for social improvement and future development for human beings through the revision of the law should be the ‘role of law’ toward the human reality. something to do.
KW - real estate sharing;morals;Right of First Refusal;civil enforcement law;abuse of rights.
DO -
UR -
ER -
Kim, Dong-Ok. (2020). The Purpose of Legislation of Real Estate Right of First Refusal System and its Preservation in Civil Enforcement Practice. Legal Theory & Practice Review, 8(1), 345-370.
Kim, Dong-Ok. 2020, "The Purpose of Legislation of Real Estate Right of First Refusal System and its Preservation in Civil Enforcement Practice", Legal Theory & Practice Review, vol.8, no.1 pp.345-370.
Kim, Dong-Ok "The Purpose of Legislation of Real Estate Right of First Refusal System and its Preservation in Civil Enforcement Practice" Legal Theory & Practice Review 8.1 pp.345-370 (2020) : 345.
Kim, Dong-Ok. The Purpose of Legislation of Real Estate Right of First Refusal System and its Preservation in Civil Enforcement Practice. 2020; 8(1), 345-370.
Kim, Dong-Ok. "The Purpose of Legislation of Real Estate Right of First Refusal System and its Preservation in Civil Enforcement Practice" Legal Theory & Practice Review 8, no.1 (2020) : 345-370.
Kim, Dong-Ok. The Purpose of Legislation of Real Estate Right of First Refusal System and its Preservation in Civil Enforcement Practice. Legal Theory & Practice Review, 8(1), 345-370.
Kim, Dong-Ok. The Purpose of Legislation of Real Estate Right of First Refusal System and its Preservation in Civil Enforcement Practice. Legal Theory & Practice Review. 2020; 8(1) 345-370.
Kim, Dong-Ok. The Purpose of Legislation of Real Estate Right of First Refusal System and its Preservation in Civil Enforcement Practice. 2020; 8(1), 345-370.
Kim, Dong-Ok. "The Purpose of Legislation of Real Estate Right of First Refusal System and its Preservation in Civil Enforcement Practice" Legal Theory & Practice Review 8, no.1 (2020) : 345-370.
