Legal Theory & Practice Review 2023 KCI Impact Factor : 1.03
-
pISSN : 2288-1840
- https://journal.kci.go.kr/kltp
KJCKorea
Journal Central
A Study on the Celerity Effects of Punishment on Deterrance
- Legal Theory & Practice Review
- Abbr : LTPR
- 2021, 9(4), pp.473-494
- Publisher : The Korea Society for Legal Theory and Practice Inc.
- Research Area : Social Science > Law
- Received : November 12, 2021
- Accepted : November 25, 2021
- Published : November 30, 2021
Kim, Yong-Seok 1, MoonKwi KIM 2
1Texa A&M University-Kingsville
2호서대학교
Candidate
ABSTRACT
Deterrence theory in criminal justice uses the sanction threats as the main explanatory factor, which is supposed to lead potential criminals to avoiding criminal commissions. Deterrence perspective assumes that people can calculate the benefit from a crime and the likely costs, and that people are willing and able to compare the former with the latter. Beccaria maintained the deterrence effects of the celerity, certainty, and severity with the same emphases. However, most of deterrence literature has focused on the certainty and severity isolating the celerity. This study examines utilitarian rationales for punishment, research on deterrence perspective, celerity effects of punishment, and speed trial laws. Finally, the refined meanings of the celerity in criminal justice system and the ways for advancing the understanding and application of the celerity in criminal justice system are explored.
Statistics
-
372 Viewed
-
0 Downloaded
Tools
Issue List
Citation status
* References for papers published after 2023 are currently being built.
[journal]
Abramowitz(A. J.)
/ 1990
/ Effectiveness of delayed punishment in an applied setting
/ Behavior Therapy
21(2)
: 231~239
[journal]
Akers, R. L.
/ 1990
/ Rational choice, deterrence, and social learning theory in criminology : The path not taken
/ The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology
81(5)
: 653~676
[journal]
Alkon, C.
/ 2015
/ An overlooked key to reversing mass incarceration:Reforming the law to reduce prosecutorial power in plea bargaining
/ University of Maryland Law Journal of Race, Religion, Gender and Class
15(2)
: 190~208
[journal]
Andenaes, J.
/ 1971
/ The Moral or educative influence of criminal law
/ Journal of Social Issues
27(2)
: 17~31
[journal]
Antia, K. D.
/ 2006
/ How does enforcement deter gray market incidence
/ Journal of Marketing
70
: 92~106
[journal]
Bailey, W. C.
/ 1980
/ Deterrence and the celerity of the death penalty : A neglected question in deterrence research
/ Social Force
58(4)
: 1308~1333
[book]
Beccaria, C.
/ 2007
/ On crimes and punishments and other writings
/ University of Toronto Press
[book]
Becker, G. S.
/ 1968
/ The economic dimensions of crime
/ Palgrave Macmillan
: 13~68
[journal]
Beckett, K.
/ 2018
/ The politics, promise, and peril of criminal justice reform in the context of mass incarceration
/ Annual Review of Criminology
1
: 235~259
[journal]
Blank, H.
/ 2013
/ Temporal characteristics of the influence of punishment on perceptual decision making in the human brain
/ Journal of Neuroscience
33(9)
: 3939~3952
[journal]
Brooks, B. P.
/ 1994
/ A New speedy trial standard for Barker v Wingo : reviving a Constitutional remedy in an age of statutes
/ The University of Chicago Law Review
61(2)
: 587~611
[journal]
Dickson, M. F.
/ 2021
/ Conviction celerity and intervention compliance as predictors of DUI recidivism : a mediation model of deterrence among Kentucky DUI offenders
/ Journal of Offender Rehabilitation
60(5)
: 311~328
[book]
Diver-Stamnes, A. C.
/ 1995
/ Prevent, repent, reform, revenge: A study in adolescent moral development (No. 30)
/ Greenwood Publishing Group
[book]
Eide, E.
/ 1994
/ The determinants of crime. In Economics of Crime: Deterrence and the Rational Offender
/ Emerald Group Publishing Limited
[book]
Finckenauer, J. O.
/ 1982
/ Scared straight! and the panacea phenomenon
/ Prentice-Hall
: 257~257
[journal]
Garner, J. H.
/ 1987
/ Delay reduction in the federal courts: Rule 50(b) and the Federal Speedy Trial Act of 1974
/ Journal of Quantitative Criminology
3(3)
: 229~250
[book]
Gottfredson, M. R.
/ 1990
/ A general theory of crime
/ Stanford University Press
[journal]
Hamburg, D.
/ 2014
/ A broken clock: Fixing New York's speedy trial statute
/ Columbia Journal of Law and Social Problems
48
: 223~264
[journal]
Hirschfield, P. J.
/ 2008
/ Preparing for prison? The criminalization of school discipline in the USA
/ Theoretical Criminology
12(1)
: 79~101
[journal]
Horney, J.
/ 1992
/ Risk perceptions among serious offenders:The role of crime and punishment
/ Criminology
30(4)
: 575~594
[journal]
Jacobs, B. A.
/ 2010
/ Deterrence and deterrability
/ Criminology
48(2)
: 417~441
[journal]
Kilmer, B.
/ 2013
/ Efficacy of frequent monitoring with swift, certain, and modest sanctions for violations: Insights from South Dakota’s 24/7 Sobriety Project
/ American Journal of Public Health
103(1)
: e37~e43
[journal]
Kleck, G.
/ 2005
/ The Missing link in general deterrence research
/ Criminology
43(3)
: 623~660
[journal]
Klepper, S.
/ 1989
/ Certainty and severity of punishment revisited
/ Criminology
27
: 721~746
[journal]
Lewis, R. V.
/ 1983
/ Scared Straight-California style : Evaluation of the San Quentin SquiresProgram
/ Criminal Justice and Behavior
10(2)
: 209~226
[journal]
Listwan, S. J.
/ 2013
/ The pains of imprisonment revisited : The impact of strain on inmate recidivism
/ Justice Quarterly
30(1)
: 144~168
[journal]
Mann, R. E.
/ 2003
/ The Effects of drinking-driving laws : a test of the differential deterrence hypothesis
/ Addiction
98
: 1531~1536
[journal]
Marvell, T. B.
/ 1991
/ The Impact of Speedy Trial Laws in Connecticut and North Carolina
/ Justice System Journal
15(1)
: 343~357
[journal]
Mendes, S. M.
/ 2004
/ Certainty, severity, and their relative deterrent effects : questioning the implications of the role of risk in criminal deterrence policy
/ Policy Studies Journal
32(1)
: 59~74
[journal]
Nagin, D. S.
/ 2001
/ Integrating celerity, impulsivity, and extralegal sanction threats into a model of general deterrence : Theory and evidence
/ Criminology
39(4)
: 865~891
[journal]
Nagin, D. S.
/ 2006
/ Public preferences for rehabilitation versus incarceration of juvenile offenders : Evidence from a contingent valuation survey
/ Criminology & Public Policy
5(4)
: 627~652
[journal]
Paternoster, R.
/ 1987
/ The Deterrent effect of the perceived certainty and severity of punishment : a review of the evidence and issues
/ Justice Quarterly
4
: 173~217
[journal]
Paternoster, R.
/ 1996
/ Sanction threats and appeals to morality: Testing a rational choice model of corporate crime
/ Law and Society Review
: 549~583
[journal]
Pestello, H. F.
/ 1984
/ Deterrence : A Reconceptualization
/ Crime & Delinquency
30(4)
: 593~609
[journal]
Pogarsky, G.
/ 2002
/ Identifying"deterrable"offenders : implications for research on deterrence
/ Justice Quarterly
19(3)
: 431~452
[journal]
Pogarsky, G.
/ 2004
/ Modeling change in perceptions about sanction threats : the neglected linkage in deterrence theory
/ Journal of Quantitative Criminology
20(4)
: 343~369
[book]
Pratt, T. C.
/ 2018
/ Deterrence, Choice, and Crime
/ Routledge
: 187~210
[book]
Simon, J.
/ 2007
/ Governing through crime : How the war on crime transformed American democracy and created a culture of fear
/ Oxford University Press
[journal]
Stevens, E.
/ 1999
/ Applying deterrence theory in the context of corporate wrongdoing : limitations on punitive damages
/ Journal of Criminal Justice
27(3)
: 195~207
[journal]
Tonry, M.
/ 2014
/ Why crime rates are falling throughout the Western world
/ Crime and Justice
43(1)
: 1~63
[journal]
Wagenaar, A. C.
/ 2007
/ Effects of drivers’ license suspension policies on alcohol-related crash involvement : long-term follow-up in forty-six states
/ Alcoholism : Clinical and Experimental Research
31(8)
: 1399~1406
[journal]
Zoglo, M.
/ 2020
/ Statutory Speedy Trial Period Calculations for Dismissed and Refiled Charges : A Case Study of Colorado's Approach
/ Washington University Law Review
97(3)
: 903~951