본문 바로가기
  • Home

Duty of explanation and Civil Liability in medical practice

  • Legal Theory & Practice Review
  • Abbr : LTPR
  • 2023, 11(1), pp.207-234
  • Publisher : The Korea Society for Legal Theory and Practice Inc.
  • Research Area : Social Science > Law
  • Received : February 7, 2023
  • Accepted : February 25, 2023
  • Published : February 28, 2023

Yeon Hwa Jun 1

1극동대학교

Accredited

ABSTRACT

Medical practices require various incidental acts in the process of understanding and cooperating with each other to achieve the purpose of treating diseases. In other words, there will be multiple medical practices for patients and doctors to treat or improve diseases, and new treatments and risks appear, so the need for medical intervention or doctor's explanation and patient consent can continue to appear. The obligation to explain the patient's symptoms, the content and necessity of the treatment method, the risks in the treatment process, the existence and effectiveness of alternative treatment methods, and the prognosis and post-treatment sequelae. In the case of medical practice, it would be safe to classify the medical personnel's obligation to explain ① the explanation for medical treatment as an explanation for instructions or guidance such as treatment method, and ② the explanation for consent as an explanation for diagnosis, progress, and risk of patients. This obligation to explain is understood as a legal obligation under a medical contract, and the causes of the right to claim damages for violating the obligation to explain are tort liability and default liability under civil law. Since there is no significant difference in claim requirements between them, the majority theory and precedent take the content of the claim competition theory.

Citation status

* References for papers published after 2023 are currently being built.