@article{ART003183937},
author={Lee Jin Hong},
title={A Study on the jurisdiction (address, residence, breeding place) of registration criteria for companion animals},
journal={Legal Theory & Practice Review},
issn={2288-1840},
year={2025},
volume={13},
number={1},
pages={251-269}
TY - JOUR
AU - Lee Jin Hong
TI - A Study on the jurisdiction (address, residence, breeding place) of registration criteria for companion animals
JO - Legal Theory & Practice Review
PY - 2025
VL - 13
IS - 1
PB - The Korea Society for Legal Theory and Practice Inc.
SP - 251
EP - 269
SN - 2288-1840
AB - In the case of the registration system for companion animals, the breeding permit system for vicious dogs, and the temperament evaluation system, it is necessary to review the criteria for the registration criteria (address, place of residence, breeding place) of companion animals, considering that the actual breeding place (breeding place) and registration information are different. If we are to make a suggestion for the registration criteria (address, place of residence, breeding place) for companion animals, first, both the address of the owner (breeder and guardian) and the breeding place (breeding place) of the companion animal should be listed (there may be issues with local government management or budget) so that they can be applied or selected. The basic premise here is that a system capable of managing the registration information of companion animals in real time should be established and linked (National Animal Protection Information System) so that it can be quickly searched and changed. Second, the registration criteria for companion animals should be changed from the owner (foster and guardian) to the actual place of custody (breeding place). The basic registration should be at the address of the owner (foster and guardian), and additional registration should be at the actual place of custody (private place). As a basic prerequisite, reporting should be mandatory when the registered place of custody (breeding place) is changed. Third, in the case of temperament evaluation, it should be conducted at the actual place of custody (breeding place) of the companion animal, not the address of the owner (foster and guardian). To this end, the place of custody (breeding place) must be clearly described and directly investigated. In particular, in the case of temperament evaluation, the results may be even worse if it deviates significantly from or is different from the actual living environment.
KW - Companion Animal;Registration;Jurisdiction;Address;Breeding Place.
DO -
UR -
ER -
Lee Jin Hong. (2025). A Study on the jurisdiction (address, residence, breeding place) of registration criteria for companion animals. Legal Theory & Practice Review, 13(1), 251-269.
Lee Jin Hong. 2025, "A Study on the jurisdiction (address, residence, breeding place) of registration criteria for companion animals", Legal Theory & Practice Review, vol.13, no.1 pp.251-269.
Lee Jin Hong "A Study on the jurisdiction (address, residence, breeding place) of registration criteria for companion animals" Legal Theory & Practice Review 13.1 pp.251-269 (2025) : 251.
Lee Jin Hong. A Study on the jurisdiction (address, residence, breeding place) of registration criteria for companion animals. 2025; 13(1), 251-269.
Lee Jin Hong. "A Study on the jurisdiction (address, residence, breeding place) of registration criteria for companion animals" Legal Theory & Practice Review 13, no.1 (2025) : 251-269.
Lee Jin Hong. A Study on the jurisdiction (address, residence, breeding place) of registration criteria for companion animals. Legal Theory & Practice Review, 13(1), 251-269.
Lee Jin Hong. A Study on the jurisdiction (address, residence, breeding place) of registration criteria for companion animals. Legal Theory & Practice Review. 2025; 13(1) 251-269.
Lee Jin Hong. A Study on the jurisdiction (address, residence, breeding place) of registration criteria for companion animals. 2025; 13(1), 251-269.
Lee Jin Hong. "A Study on the jurisdiction (address, residence, breeding place) of registration criteria for companion animals" Legal Theory & Practice Review 13, no.1 (2025) : 251-269.
