Reconsideration on the Work’s Internal and External Context Regarding the 『Seolgongchanjeon』 Shock -Focusing on cross-examination over 『Yongjaechonghwa』 and 『Yongcheondamjeokgi』- (설공찬전 파동의 작품 내외적 맥락 재 고찰 - 용재총화 용천담적 교차 검토를 중심으로)

Kim Dohyoung (김도형)

Reconsideration on the Work’s Internal and External Context Regarding the 『Seolgongchanjeon』 Shock -Focusing on cross-examination over 『Yongjaechonghwa』 and 『Yongcheondamjeokgi』-

Korean Language & Literature
2022, (121), pp.81-111
Publisher : Korean Language & Literature
Research Area : Humanities > Korean Language and Literature
Received : July 10, 2022
Accepted : July 27, 2022
Published : July 31, 2022

Kim Dohyoung ¹

¹전북대학교

Accredited

ABSTRACT

This study cross-examined two works recording Chae Su in order to clarify the nature of the 『Seolgongchanjeon』 shock that occurred in the initial reign of King Jungjong. Seong Hyeon recorded an anecdote about his colleague, Chae Su, in 『Yongjaechonghwa』 while Kim An-ro wrote 『Yongcheondamjeokgi』 in exile at the time when 『Yongjaechonghwa』 was published including an anecdote of his father-in-law, Chae Su, in it. In this sense, 『Yongjaechonghwa』 and 『Yongcheondamjeokgi』 work as records on political fluctuations in the 15th and 16th centuries and as cross-narratives to understand Chae Su’s 『Seolgongchanjeon 』. In 『Yongjaechonghwa』, Chae Su is depicted as Sadaebu equipped with literary talent and wit, and in 『Yongcheondamjeokgi』, he highlights Chae Su’s reputation from a son-in-law’s standpoint. This is primarily attributed to the difference of relationship as a friend and son-in-law, but it provides a piece of information that the person named Chae Su was not the owner of unconventional ideas. In the context of 『Yongjaechonghwa』, the ban of 『Seolgongchanjeon』 stems from the gap between narrative verisimilitudity and the form of a traditional narrative, and the context of 『Yongcheondamjeokgi 』 provides the logic that 『Seolgongchanjeon』 is grounded on the true story, which dilutes the unconventionality of the work. In conclusion, by comparing the articles of 『Yongjaechonghwa』 and 『Yongcheondamjeokgi』, this author could learn that the 『Seolgongchanjeon』 shock originated from the perspective of investigating Cha Sue’s ideas to see his political orientation. Also, with 『Yongjaechonghwa』, it was possible to find out newly about the fact that the Chinese envoy, ‘Aebak’, appearing in 『Seolgongchanjeon』 was a real person. This reveals a different perspective from the elements previously presented for the ban of 『Seolgongchanjeon』, for instance, possession or the experience of ghost or the afterworld. This is because such subject matters are frequently mentioned in 『Yongjaechonghwa』, too, and even Seong Hyeon himself describes his own stories about seeing ghosts. Moreover, Chae Su’s story about experiencing ghost in 『Yongcheondamjeokgi』 serves as an anecdote that reinforces the fact that the ban of 『Seolgongchanjeon』 that formed the center of controversy before was not intended but it came from the writer’s own experience. Therefore, cross-examination over 『Yongjaechonghwa』 and 『Yongcheondamjeokgi』 presents multidimensional information about Chae Su and provides new context that is useful to understand 『Seolgongchanjeon』.

KEYWORDS

Yongjaechonghwa[慵齋叢話], Yongcheondamjeokgi[龍泉談寂記], Seolgongchanjeon[薛公瓚傳], Chae Soo[蔡壽], Seong Hyeon[成俔], Kim An-ro[金安老], narrative perspective, characterization

KJCKorea
Journal Central

Korean Language & Literature 2023 KCI Impact Factor : 0.63