This study analyses the recognition of cash settlement issues for housing redevelopment projects (HRPs) and introduces political implications. Based on the depth interview with 3 groups, the main results are as follows ; First, group 1, who asserts the interest of redevelopment partnership (RP), underlines the restraint programs of cash settlement to facilitate HRPs. Second, group 2, who defends the rights of partnership members (PMs), emphasizes the protection programs for PMs who want cash settlement on account of unexpected additional expenses. It means there is a large gab between the recognitions of the two groups. Apart from the judgment which opinions are right and wrong, we can reason the difficulties of conflicts control related cash settlement increase. And the last, group 3, who are experts like a professor, a lawyer and an official etc, points up provision of the articles ruled the relation between ‘cash settlement’ and ‘deprivation of member’s qualification’ or ‘ownership transfer’ on the Act. After the amendment of the articles which range the rights and responsibilities of RP and PMs, the logical grounds for detailed cash settlement standards can be more clear.