본문 바로가기
  • Home

Discourses on the ‘Image-Figure’ of Korean Painting Since the 1970’s

  • The Journal of Aesthetics and Science of Art
  • Abbr : JASA
  • 2025, 74(), pp.6~28
  • Publisher : 한국미학예술학회
  • Research Area : Arts and Kinesiology > Other Arts and Kinesiology
  • Received : December 26, 2024
  • Accepted : January 11, 2025
  • Published : February 28, 2025

Jisuk Hong 1

1단국대학교

Accredited

ABSTRACT

Since the 1970’s, the discourse on the ‘image-figure’ of Korean painting has developed into two branches. One is the branch that did not completely accept the image-figure. Painters and art critics who valued abstraction and flatness have denied the image-figure in painting, but were also worried that this would result in a literal flatness, so they had a dual attitude of denying the image-figure and secretly affirming it. The other is the branch that positively accepted the image-figure. Painters and art critics belonging to this branch actively accepted the image-figure, but the one they brought back into painting was a kind of “return of the repression,” which was very different from the familiar ‘image-figure’. Such figures were often referred to as ‘neo-figurative’. In other words, it had to be an image-figure, but not an image-figure. It would not be wrong to say that the former is abstract but not abstract, and the latter is an image-figure, but not image-figure. In the 1990’s, when the trend of anti-modern or post-modern prevailed, these two branches were hybridized, which many critics and painters of that time called ‘post-modern painting’.

Citation status

* References for papers published after 2023 are currently being built.