@article{ART001387171},
author={구자건 and 강미연 and YONG-CHIL SEO and 선종근 and 윤보라 and 김병훈},
title={An Analysis of Local Government’s Intentions for Privatization Policy of Waste Treatment Facilities in Korea},
journal={Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment},
issn={1225-7184},
year={2009},
volume={18},
number={5},
pages={257-270}
TY - JOUR
AU - 구자건
AU - 강미연
AU - YONG-CHIL SEO
AU - 선종근
AU - 윤보라
AU - 김병훈
TI - An Analysis of Local Government’s Intentions for Privatization Policy of Waste Treatment Facilities in Korea
JO - Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment
PY - 2009
VL - 18
IS - 5
PB - Korean Society Of Environmental Impact Assessment
SP - 257
EP - 270
SN - 1225-7184
AB - The central government in Korea has pursued a policy to privatize municipal solid waste
treatment facilities in order to enhance the effectiveness of public financial management in
recent years. To understand the intentions of local governments on this policy, the survey with
questionnaires on 37 out of 256 local governments was made in October, 2007. The results were
analyzed and compared in 6 classified policy areas. The results showed that local government
had enough financial status to operate the facilities with proper services and had the opinion
with positive management in finance with increasing rate of prospective views. Among the
facilities operated by local governments, the satisfaction levels for landfill(46.2%) and
incineration(40.0%) were relatively higher. However those for recycling and food waste
resource facilities were not satisfied with showing lower rate of satisfaction. The priority of
privatization in consideration among them were following in order of food waste resource
plants(76.2%), incinerators(63.6%), and recycling facilities(53.9%) and the most considerable
reason to privatize them was due to resolve financial problems(59.7%). They thought and
expected that the privatization would provide cost reduction effects in local governments and
also be easier to achieve the environmental goals. To enhance such privatization, expanding
more incentives by central government would be essential as shown in the investigation of this
survey.
KW - Waste treatment;Privatization;Local government;Public service
DO -
UR -
ER -
구자건, 강미연, YONG-CHIL SEO, 선종근, 윤보라 and 김병훈. (2009). An Analysis of Local Government’s Intentions for Privatization Policy of Waste Treatment Facilities in Korea. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment, 18(5), 257-270.
구자건, 강미연, YONG-CHIL SEO, 선종근, 윤보라 and 김병훈. 2009, "An Analysis of Local Government’s Intentions for Privatization Policy of Waste Treatment Facilities in Korea", Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment, vol.18, no.5 pp.257-270.
구자건, 강미연, YONG-CHIL SEO, 선종근, 윤보라, 김병훈 "An Analysis of Local Government’s Intentions for Privatization Policy of Waste Treatment Facilities in Korea" Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment 18.5 pp.257-270 (2009) : 257.
구자건, 강미연, YONG-CHIL SEO, 선종근, 윤보라, 김병훈. An Analysis of Local Government’s Intentions for Privatization Policy of Waste Treatment Facilities in Korea. 2009; 18(5), 257-270.
구자건, 강미연, YONG-CHIL SEO, 선종근, 윤보라 and 김병훈. "An Analysis of Local Government’s Intentions for Privatization Policy of Waste Treatment Facilities in Korea" Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment 18, no.5 (2009) : 257-270.
구자건; 강미연; YONG-CHIL SEO; 선종근; 윤보라; 김병훈. An Analysis of Local Government’s Intentions for Privatization Policy of Waste Treatment Facilities in Korea. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment, 18(5), 257-270.
구자건; 강미연; YONG-CHIL SEO; 선종근; 윤보라; 김병훈. An Analysis of Local Government’s Intentions for Privatization Policy of Waste Treatment Facilities in Korea. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment. 2009; 18(5) 257-270.
구자건, 강미연, YONG-CHIL SEO, 선종근, 윤보라, 김병훈. An Analysis of Local Government’s Intentions for Privatization Policy of Waste Treatment Facilities in Korea. 2009; 18(5), 257-270.
구자건, 강미연, YONG-CHIL SEO, 선종근, 윤보라 and 김병훈. "An Analysis of Local Government’s Intentions for Privatization Policy of Waste Treatment Facilities in Korea" Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment 18, no.5 (2009) : 257-270.
