@article{ART002355290},
author={강유진 and Yumi Kim and Nankyoung Moon},
title={Environmental Improvement Effect and Social Benefit of Environmental Impact Assessment: Focusing on Thermal Power Plant},
journal={Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment},
issn={1225-7184},
year={2018},
volume={27},
number={3},
pages={322-333}
TY - JOUR
AU - 강유진
AU - Yumi Kim
AU - Nankyoung Moon
TI - Environmental Improvement Effect and Social Benefit of Environmental Impact Assessment: Focusing on Thermal Power Plant
JO - Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment
PY - 2018
VL - 27
IS - 3
PB - Korean Society Of Environmental Impact Assessment
SP - 322
EP - 333
SN - 1225-7184
AB - This study was carried out to measure atmospheric environmental improvement effect and estimate its social benefit of thermal power plants through Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) for quantitative analysis about operational performances of EIA. In this study, ‘EIA outcome’ is defined as whether or not the system is implemented, therefore, environmental standard to be followed by each project and consultation contents were compared. In total 60 cases of thermal power plant construction projects that have been consulted over the past 10 years since 2010, major air pollutants have been significantly reduced after the implementation of EIA. The PM10 reduced annual 3,745 tons, NO2 by 74,569 tons, and SO2 by 37,647 tons, which were estimated at approximately 240 billion won~5 trillion 967 billion won per year for social benefit. This means the total cost of power plant operations will be cut to 7 trillion 192 billion won~178 trillion 994 billion won over a 30-year period. The reduced amount of air pollutants emitted by energy generation facilities across the country is worth 50%, and its economic value is larger than the annual Current Health Expenditure in Korea. This is meant by the fact that all projects are subject to uniform criteria under the existing relevant regulation, but that each project plans are optimized according to the characteristics of target areas and projects through the process of EIA.
KW - Effect of Environmental Impact Assessment;Consultation Standards;Social Benefit;Thermal Power Plant;Emission of Air Pollutants
DO -
UR -
ER -
강유진, Yumi Kim and Nankyoung Moon. (2018). Environmental Improvement Effect and Social Benefit of Environmental Impact Assessment: Focusing on Thermal Power Plant. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment, 27(3), 322-333.
강유진, Yumi Kim and Nankyoung Moon. 2018, "Environmental Improvement Effect and Social Benefit of Environmental Impact Assessment: Focusing on Thermal Power Plant", Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment, vol.27, no.3 pp.322-333.
강유진, Yumi Kim, Nankyoung Moon "Environmental Improvement Effect and Social Benefit of Environmental Impact Assessment: Focusing on Thermal Power Plant" Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment 27.3 pp.322-333 (2018) : 322.
강유진, Yumi Kim, Nankyoung Moon. Environmental Improvement Effect and Social Benefit of Environmental Impact Assessment: Focusing on Thermal Power Plant. 2018; 27(3), 322-333.
강유진, Yumi Kim and Nankyoung Moon. "Environmental Improvement Effect and Social Benefit of Environmental Impact Assessment: Focusing on Thermal Power Plant" Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment 27, no.3 (2018) : 322-333.
강유진; Yumi Kim; Nankyoung Moon. Environmental Improvement Effect and Social Benefit of Environmental Impact Assessment: Focusing on Thermal Power Plant. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment, 27(3), 322-333.
강유진; Yumi Kim; Nankyoung Moon. Environmental Improvement Effect and Social Benefit of Environmental Impact Assessment: Focusing on Thermal Power Plant. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment. 2018; 27(3) 322-333.
강유진, Yumi Kim, Nankyoung Moon. Environmental Improvement Effect and Social Benefit of Environmental Impact Assessment: Focusing on Thermal Power Plant. 2018; 27(3), 322-333.
강유진, Yumi Kim and Nankyoung Moon. "Environmental Improvement Effect and Social Benefit of Environmental Impact Assessment: Focusing on Thermal Power Plant" Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment 27, no.3 (2018) : 322-333.