@article{ART003026945},
author={Seulki Koo and Lee Young Soo and Sangdon Lee},
title={Comparison of Carbon Storage Based on Alternative Action by Land Use Planning},
journal={Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment},
issn={1225-7184},
year={2023},
volume={32},
number={6},
pages={377-388}
TY - JOUR
AU - Seulki Koo
AU - Lee Young Soo
AU - Sangdon Lee
TI - Comparison of Carbon Storage Based on Alternative Action by Land Use Planning
JO - Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment
PY - 2023
VL - 32
IS - 6
PB - Korean Society Of Environmental Impact Assessment
SP - 377
EP - 388
SN - 1225-7184
AB - Carbon management is emerging as an important factorfor global warming control, and land use change is considered one of the causes. To quantify the changes in carbon stocks due to development, this study attempted to calculate carbon storage by borrowing the formula of the InVEST Carbon Storage and Sequestration Model (InVEST Model). Before analyzing carbon stocks, a carbon pool was compiled based on previous studies in Korea. Then, we estimated the change in carbon stocks according to the development of Osong National Industrial Park (ONIP) and the application of alternatives.
The analysis shows that 16,789.5 MgC will be emitted under Alternative 1 and 16,305.3 MgC under Alternative 2. These emissions account for 44.4% and 43.1% of the pre-project carbon stock, respectively, and shows that choosing Alternative 2 is advantageous forreducing carbon emissions.
The difference is likely due to the difference in grassland area between Alternatives 1 and 2. Even if Alternative 2 is selected, efforts are needed to increase the carbon storage effect by managing the appropriate level of green cover in the grassland, creating multi-layered vegetation, and installing low-energy facilities. In addition, it is suggested to conserve wetlands that can be lost during the stream improvement process or to create artificial wetlands to increase carbon storage.
The assessment of carbon storage using carbon pools by land cover can improve the objectivity of comparison and evaluation analysis results forland use plans in Environmental Impact Assessment and Strategic Environmental Impact Assessment. In addition, the carbon pool generated in this study is expected to be used as a basis for improving the accuracy of such analyses.
KW - carbon stock;land use change;Osong National Industrial Park;land management;InVEST Carbon Storage and Sequestration model
DO -
UR -
ER -
Seulki Koo, Lee Young Soo and Sangdon Lee. (2023). Comparison of Carbon Storage Based on Alternative Action by Land Use Planning. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment, 32(6), 377-388.
Seulki Koo, Lee Young Soo and Sangdon Lee. 2023, "Comparison of Carbon Storage Based on Alternative Action by Land Use Planning", Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment, vol.32, no.6 pp.377-388.
Seulki Koo, Lee Young Soo, Sangdon Lee "Comparison of Carbon Storage Based on Alternative Action by Land Use Planning" Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment 32.6 pp.377-388 (2023) : 377.
Seulki Koo, Lee Young Soo, Sangdon Lee. Comparison of Carbon Storage Based on Alternative Action by Land Use Planning. 2023; 32(6), 377-388.
Seulki Koo, Lee Young Soo and Sangdon Lee. "Comparison of Carbon Storage Based on Alternative Action by Land Use Planning" Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment 32, no.6 (2023) : 377-388.
Seulki Koo; Lee Young Soo; Sangdon Lee. Comparison of Carbon Storage Based on Alternative Action by Land Use Planning. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment, 32(6), 377-388.
Seulki Koo; Lee Young Soo; Sangdon Lee. Comparison of Carbon Storage Based on Alternative Action by Land Use Planning. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment. 2023; 32(6) 377-388.
Seulki Koo, Lee Young Soo, Sangdon Lee. Comparison of Carbon Storage Based on Alternative Action by Land Use Planning. 2023; 32(6), 377-388.
Seulki Koo, Lee Young Soo and Sangdon Lee. "Comparison of Carbon Storage Based on Alternative Action by Land Use Planning" Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment 32, no.6 (2023) : 377-388.