@article{ART002827119},
author={DONG-HYUK KIM},
title={Language Variation in Biblical Hebrew},
journal={Korean Journal of Old Testament Studies},
issn={1229-0521},
year={2022},
volume={28},
number={1},
pages={8-33},
doi={10.24333/jkots.2022.28.1.8}
TY - JOUR
AU - DONG-HYUK KIM
TI - Language Variation in Biblical Hebrew
JO - Korean Journal of Old Testament Studies
PY - 2022
VL - 28
IS - 1
PB - Korean Society of Old Testament Studies
SP - 8
EP - 33
SN - 1229-0521
AB - The present study explores language variation in Biblical Hebrew from a sociolinguistic perspective. Language variation refers to the situation in which the same linguistic or grammatical meaning is realized by two or more forms (e.g., both mamlākāh and malkût in Biblical Hebrew mean “kingdom” or “reign”). So far, language variation in Biblical Hebrew has been studied mainly in the context of the Documentary Hypothesis of the Pentateuch. However, a field that focuses primarily on this phenomenon is sociolinguistics. Thus, upon defining language variation, the study surveys how linguists of the past regarded it as unimportant and arbitrary and how contemporary sociolinguists consider it foundational in understanding language. Language variation includes historical (or chronological) variation, regional variation, and social variation. The study examines the cases in Biblical Hebrew which represent these three kinds of language variation. First, mamlākāh and malkût (“kingdom”, “reign”) are an exemplar of historical variation, the choice of which in the Hebrew Bible is best explained by chronology. Second, the two relativizers ’ăšer and še- and the near homonyms šibbolet and sibbolet each illustrate regional variation. The first pair shows the contrast between the southern Judahite Hebrew and the northern Israelian Hebrew. The second pair discloses the difference of the consonant repertoire between the Gileadites and the Ephraimites. Last, in referring to oneself, the Biblical Hebrew speaker could choose from the first person singular pronoun and ‘abdĕkā/’ămātĕkā/šipḥātĕkā (“your servant”). The choice is conditioned by factors such as situation and the social statuses of the speaker and the addressee. Through studying language variation from a sociolinguistic perspective, we will have a deeper understanding of the language of Biblical Hebrew, the literary strategies of biblical writers, and the world of the Hebrew Bible.
KW - linguistic variation;sociolinguistics;chronological variation;regional variation;social variation
DO - 10.24333/jkots.2022.28.1.8
ER -
DONG-HYUK KIM. (2022). Language Variation in Biblical Hebrew. Korean Journal of Old Testament Studies, 28(1), 8-33.
DONG-HYUK KIM. 2022, "Language Variation in Biblical Hebrew", Korean Journal of Old Testament Studies, vol.28, no.1 pp.8-33. Available from: doi:10.24333/jkots.2022.28.1.8
DONG-HYUK KIM "Language Variation in Biblical Hebrew" Korean Journal of Old Testament Studies 28.1 pp.8-33 (2022) : 8.
DONG-HYUK KIM. Language Variation in Biblical Hebrew. 2022; 28(1), 8-33. Available from: doi:10.24333/jkots.2022.28.1.8
DONG-HYUK KIM. "Language Variation in Biblical Hebrew" Korean Journal of Old Testament Studies 28, no.1 (2022) : 8-33.doi: 10.24333/jkots.2022.28.1.8
DONG-HYUK KIM. Language Variation in Biblical Hebrew. Korean Journal of Old Testament Studies, 28(1), 8-33. doi: 10.24333/jkots.2022.28.1.8
DONG-HYUK KIM. Language Variation in Biblical Hebrew. Korean Journal of Old Testament Studies. 2022; 28(1) 8-33. doi: 10.24333/jkots.2022.28.1.8
DONG-HYUK KIM. Language Variation in Biblical Hebrew. 2022; 28(1), 8-33. Available from: doi:10.24333/jkots.2022.28.1.8
DONG-HYUK KIM. "Language Variation in Biblical Hebrew" Korean Journal of Old Testament Studies 28, no.1 (2022) : 8-33.doi: 10.24333/jkots.2022.28.1.8