본문 바로가기
  • Home
Basic Search

Comparative Analysis of Korean Universities’ Journal Publication Research Performance Evaluation Standards

  • Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society
  • Abbr : JKLISS
  • 2017, 48(2), pp.295-322
  • DOI : 10.16981/kliss.48.2.201706.295
  • Publisher : Korean Library And Information Science Society
  • Research Area : Interdisciplinary Studies > Library and Information Science
  • Received : May 19, 2017
  • Accepted : June 19, 2017

LeeHyekyung 1,  Kiduk Yang ORD ID 2

1
2경북대학교

Accredited

ABSTRACT

As a first step in developing a more effective and robust approach to faculty research performance assessment, this study analyzed the existing faculty research assessment methods by comparing Korean universities’ research evaluation standards, National Research Foundation of Korea’s (KRF) standard for assessing research proposals, and various bibliometric measures. The study data included research evaluation standards of KRF along with 27 Korean universities with Library and Information Science (LIS) department, and the publication data of 183 LIS faculties in Korean universities from 2001 to 2015, which consisted of 3,863 papers 16,978 citations. After the comparative analysis of research evaluation standards, the study examined the rankings of institutions and faculty produced by applying the collected standards and bibliometric metrics to the publication data. The study showed that Korean university standards for research evaluation, which aim to consider both productivity and impact of faculty research, differ from similar bibliometric measures such as h-index, and the difference could significantly impact the assessment of faculty research performance

Statistics

  • 463 Viewed
  • 325 Downloaded

Tools

Issue List

Citation status

* References for papers published after 2023 are currently being built.

Basic Search Advanced Search