Modern English Education 2023 KCI Impact Factor : 1.55
-
pISSN : 1598-0782 / eISSN : 2586-6141
- https://journal.kci.go.kr/meeso
KJCKorea
Journal Central
Responding to Students Writing: Peer and Teacher Feedback
- Modern English Education
- Abbr : MEESO
- 2007, 8(2), pp.59-74
- Publisher : The Modern English Education Society
- Research Area : Humanities > English Language and Literature > English Language Teaching
1대구대학교
Candidate
ABSTRACT
no data found.
Statistics
-
221 Viewed
-
71 Downloaded
Tools
Issue List
Citation status
* References for papers published after 2023 are currently being built.
[journal]
Allaei, S. K
/ 1990
/ Exploring the dynamics of cross-cultural collaboration in writing classrooms
[journal]
Baker, M
/ 1995
/ Can lurking on the MOO help improve EFL English composition?
/ Kaoshiung, Taiwan, R. O. C.
[journal]
Berger, V
/ 1990
/ The effects of peer and self feedback
: 21~35
[journal]
Brannon, C
/ 1984
/ On students′ right to their own texts: A model of teacher response
: 157~166
[journal]
Carson, J
/ 1994
/ Writing Groups: Cross-cultural issues
: 17~30
[journal]
Cohen, A. D
/ 1987
/ Student processing of feedback on their compositions
[journal]
Cohen, A. D
/ 1990
/ Feedback on composition: Teacher and student verbal reports
[journal]
Connor, U
/ 1994
/ Peer response group in ESL writing classes: How much impact on revision?
: 257~276
[journal]
Connor, U
/ 1990
/ The teaching of topical analysis as a revision strategy: An exploratory study
/ Cambridge University Press.
: 126~139
[journal]
Davies, N. F
/ 1987
/ Peer group teaching and the composition class
: 313~323
[journal]
Emig, J
/ 1971
/ The composing processes of twelfth graders
[journal]
Ferris, D.
/ 1995
/ Student reactions to the teacher response in multiple-draft composition classrooms
29
: 33~53
[journal]
Ferris, D.
/ 1997
/ The influence of teacher commentary on student revision
31
: 315~337
[journal]
Flower, L
/ 1981
/ A cognitive process theory of writing
: 365~387
[journal]
Goldstein, L
/ 1990
/ Student input and negotiation of meaning in ESL writing conferences
: 443~460
[journal]
Graves, D
/ 1975
/ An examination of the writing processes of seven-year-old children
: 228~231
[journal]
Hairston, M
/ 1982
/ The winds of change: Thomas Kuhn and the revolution in the teaching of writing
: 76~88
[journal]
Hedgcock, J
/ 1992
/ Collaborative oral/aural revision in foreign language writing instruction
: 255~276
[journal]
Hillocks, G., Jr
/ 1986
/ Research on written composition: New directions for teaching
[journal]
James, D. R
/ 1981
/ Peer teaching in the writing classroom
: 48~50
[journal]
Jenkins, R
/ 1987
/ Responding to student writing: Written dialogues on writing and revision
: 82~86
[journal]
Knoblauch, C. H
/ 1981
/ Teacher commentary on student writing: The state of the art
: 1~4
[journal]
Koch, R
/ 1982
/ Syllogisms and superstition: The current state of responding to writing
: 464~471
[journal]
Lamberg, W
/ 1980
/ Self-provided and peer-provided feedback
: 63~69
[journal]
Leki, I
/ 1990a
/ Potential problems with peer responding in ESL writing classes
: 5~19
[journal]
Leki, I
/ 1990b
/ Coaching from the margin: issues in written responses
/ Cambridge University Press.
: 284~294
[journal]
Leki, I
/ 1991
/ The Preferences of ESL students for error correction in college-level writing classes
: 203~218
[journal]
Leki, I
/ 1992
/ Understanding ESL writers: A guide for teachers
/ Heinemann.
[journal]
Mangelsdorf, K
/ 1992
/ Peer reviews in the ESL composition classroom: What do the students think?
: 274~284
[journal]
Mendonca, C
/ 1994
/ Peer review negotiations: Revision activities in ESL writing instruction
: 745~769
[journal]
Mittan, R
/ 1989
/ The peer review process: Harnessing students′ communicative power
: 172~219
[journal]
Nelson, G. L
/ 1992
/ An L2 writing group: Task and social dimensions
: 257~276
[journal]
Nelson, G. L
/ 1993
/ Peer response groups: Do L2 writers use peer comments in revising their drafts?
: 135~142
[journal]
Patridge, K. L
/ 1983
/ A comparison of the effectiveness of peer vs. teachers evaluation for helping students of English as a second language to improve the quality of their written composition
[journal]
Perl, S
/ 1978
/ Five writers writing: Case studies of the composing processes of unskilled college writers
/ New York University.
[journal]
Perl, S
/ 1979
/ The composing processes of unskilled college writers
: 317~336
[journal]
Pianko, S
/ 1979
/ A description of the composing process of college freshman writers
: 5~22
[journal]
Radecki, P. M
/ 1988
/ ESL student reaction to written comments on their written work
: 355~365
[journal]
Reid, J
/ 1993
/ Teaching ESL writing
/ Prentice Hall Regents.
[journal]
Rohman, D. G
/ 1965
/ Pre-writing: The stage of discovery in the writing process
: 106~112
[journal]
Saito, H
/ 1994
/ Teachers′ practices and students′ preferences for feedback on second language writing: A case study of adult ESL learners
: 46~70
[journal]
Semke, H. D
/ 1984
/ The effects of the red pen
[journal]
Stanley, J
/ 1992
/ Coaching student writers to be effective peer evaluators
: 217~233
[journal]
Tyson, R. E
/ 1997.October
/ Motivation, self-confidence, and the process approach in Korean university writing classes
[journal]
Tyson, R. E.
/ 1998.January
/ Increasing motivation and confidence in Asian university- level EFL writers
[journal]
Tyson, R. E.
/ 1999.August
/ Academic writing and the process approach
[journal]
Tyson, R. E.
/ 2000
/ Increasing the effectiveness of composition instruction in Korean university English classes
21
: 205~214
[journal]
Zamel, V
/ 1983
/ The composing processes of advanced ESL students: Six case studies
: 165~187
[journal]
Zamel, V
/ 1985
/ Responding to students writing
: 79~101
[journal]
Zhang, S
/ 1995
/ Reexamining the affective advantage of peer feedback in the ESL writing class
4(3)
: 209~222