KJCKorea
Journal Central

@article{ART001764911},
author={Son, Hye-Ok},
title={A grammatical category of ‘-teo-’ in modern Korean - focusing on ‘-Teola’},
journal={Korean Semantics},
issn={1226-7198},
year={2013},
volume={40},
pages={71-110}

TY - JOUR
AU - Son, Hye-Ok
TI - A grammatical category of ‘-teo-’ in modern Korean - focusing on ‘-Teola’
JO - Korean Semantics
PY - 2013
VL - 40
IS - null
PB - The Society Of Korean Semantics
SP - 71
EP - 110
SN - 1226-7198
AB - This paper argues that ‘-teo-’ in ‘-teola’ is both a tense marker and an evidential modality marker. ‘-teo-’ has a evidential modality meaning indicating that a preceding proposition to ‘-teo-' is a speaker's a cognition through a direct sensory experience. And ‘-teo-’ also indicates the past time point when the speaker acquired the information(the cognition, the proposition). Although the time ‘-teo-’ indicates is a cognition time, ‘-teo-’ can be considerd as tense. Because the time reference of ‘-teo-’ corresponds with the definition of tense, which is a grammaticalized expression of location in time, A view of including a location of cognition time in time line in tense can give us a good explanation about ‘-eoss’ that can scope over epistemic modality construction. Many previous literature considerd ‘-teo-’as either a tense marker or a modality marker, and they accounted the another categorical characteristics to the derived meaning or a function from the categorical characteristics which they considered. But if we classify ‘-teo-’ as only a modality marker, we can not explain the imperfective aspectual meaning of ‘-teo-’ and if we classify ‘-teo-’ as only a tense marker, we can not explain why the proposition is the cognition through the speaker's direct sensory. Therefore considering ‘-teo-’ as a morpheme combining information about evidential modality and tense gives us a good explanation of ‘-teo’. Across languages evidential modality markers often have the function to indicate the time the speaker get the information, which is related with the diachronic change. ‘-Teo’ is one of this kind of evidentail modality makers.
KW - 직접적 감각(direct sense);증거 양태(evidential modality);시제(tense);인식시(cognition time);미완결상(imperfective);상대 시제(relative tense)
DO -
UR -
ER -

Son, Hye-Ok. (2013). A grammatical category of ‘-teo-’ in modern Korean - focusing on ‘-Teola’. Korean Semantics, 40, 71-110.

Son, Hye-Ok. 2013, "A grammatical category of ‘-teo-’ in modern Korean - focusing on ‘-Teola’", Korean Semantics, vol.40, pp.71-110.

Son, Hye-Ok "A grammatical category of ‘-teo-’ in modern Korean - focusing on ‘-Teola’" Korean Semantics 40 pp.71-110 (2013) : 71.

Son, Hye-Ok. A grammatical category of ‘-teo-’ in modern Korean - focusing on ‘-Teola’. 2013; 40 71-110.

Son, Hye-Ok. "A grammatical category of ‘-teo-’ in modern Korean - focusing on ‘-Teola’" Korean Semantics 40(2013) : 71-110.

Son, Hye-Ok. A grammatical category of ‘-teo-’ in modern Korean - focusing on ‘-Teola’. Korean Semantics, 40, 71-110.

Son, Hye-Ok. A grammatical category of ‘-teo-’ in modern Korean - focusing on ‘-Teola’. Korean Semantics. 2013; 40 71-110.

Son, Hye-Ok. A grammatical category of ‘-teo-’ in modern Korean - focusing on ‘-Teola’. 2013; 40 71-110.

Son, Hye-Ok. "A grammatical category of ‘-teo-’ in modern Korean - focusing on ‘-Teola’" Korean Semantics 40(2013) : 71-110.