@article{ART001893485},
author={JEON HUMIN},
title={A Study on the Korean Contrastive Focus Entailment Construction},
journal={Korean Semantics},
issn={1226-7198},
year={2014},
volume={44},
pages={235-261}
TY - JOUR
AU - JEON HUMIN
TI - A Study on the Korean Contrastive Focus Entailment Construction
JO - Korean Semantics
PY - 2014
VL - 44
IS - null
PB - The Society Of Korean Semantics
SP - 235
EP - 261
SN - 1226-7198
AB - This paper aims to reveal the semantic characteristics of the Korean contrastive focus entailment construction. The findings of this paper under this purpose are as follows. First, ‘khe-nyeng’ construction, ‘ko-sa-ha-ko’ construction, ‘mwul-lon-i-ko’ construction, and ‘mal-hal-kes-to- eps-ko’ construction are named as Contrastive focus Entailment Construction, because the antecedent word and the following word of these constructions are contrastive focus, and a proposition that is expressed by the following sentence of construction entails a proposition that is inferred from the antecedent word of construction. Second, ‘khe-nyeng’ construction and ‘ko-sa-ha-ko’ construction have negative polarity, but ‘mwul-lon-i-ko’ construction and ‘mal-hal-kes- to-eps-ko’ construction don't have. Third, all constructions are combined with ‘to’ in a negative sentence, but the [+negative polarity] types can't be combined with ‘to’ in an affirmative sentence. Fourth, the [+negative polarity] types are not the same as [-negative polarity] types in that in case of [+negative polarity] types, a proposition that is inferred from the antecedent word of construction doesn't consist of the predicate of the following sentence of construction in a affirmative sentence. Fifth, the [+negative polarity] types can't be presupposed scale in a affirmative sentence, unlike the [-negative polarity] types. Sixth, while the [+negative polarity] types select ‘-ki’ noun clause as the antecedent word of construction, the [-negative polarity] types choose ‘-um’ noun clause as the antecedent word of construction. Seventh, these differences between the two types result from negative polarity.
KW - ‘커녕(khe-nyeng)’;‘고사하고(ko-sa-ha-ko)’;‘물론이고(mwul- lon-i-ko)’;‘말할 것도 없고(mal-hal-kes-to-eps-ko)’;구문(construction);대조초점(contrastive focus);함의(entailment);부정극성(negative polarity);척도(scale)
DO -
UR -
ER -
JEON HUMIN. (2014). A Study on the Korean Contrastive Focus Entailment Construction. Korean Semantics, 44, 235-261.
JEON HUMIN. 2014, "A Study on the Korean Contrastive Focus Entailment Construction", Korean Semantics, vol.44, pp.235-261.
JEON HUMIN "A Study on the Korean Contrastive Focus Entailment Construction" Korean Semantics 44 pp.235-261 (2014) : 235.
JEON HUMIN. A Study on the Korean Contrastive Focus Entailment Construction. 2014; 44 235-261.
JEON HUMIN. "A Study on the Korean Contrastive Focus Entailment Construction" Korean Semantics 44(2014) : 235-261.
JEON HUMIN. A Study on the Korean Contrastive Focus Entailment Construction. Korean Semantics, 44, 235-261.
JEON HUMIN. A Study on the Korean Contrastive Focus Entailment Construction. Korean Semantics. 2014; 44 235-261.
JEON HUMIN. A Study on the Korean Contrastive Focus Entailment Construction. 2014; 44 235-261.
JEON HUMIN. "A Study on the Korean Contrastive Focus Entailment Construction" Korean Semantics 44(2014) : 235-261.