본문 바로가기
  • Home

The Linguistic Nature of ‘Contrastiveness’ Meaning in Korean—with Reference to the Information Structure

  • Korean Semantics
  • 2014, 45(), pp.129-157
  • Publisher : The Society Of Korean Semantics
  • Research Area : Humanities > Korean Language and Literature

Park, Chulwoo 1

1안양대학교

Accredited

ABSTRACT

In this paper we investigate what the nature of ‘contrastiveness’ meaning in Korean is with reference to the information structure. By far, -{neun} has been considered to have two meanings depending on its distribution in a sentence, one topic marker and the other ‘contrast’ marker, and many Korean grammar textbooks have assumed that ‘contrast’ is the basic meaning of –{nean}. Moreover, recently there arose an argument that –{nean} can even be a contrastive focus marker, paying no attention to its topic marking function. Here we argue that in reality the ‘contrast’ meaning of -{neun} is a byproduct of paralleling more than one topic constructions, or implicature caused by ‘contrastive stress.’ According to Dretske(1972) and Chafe(1970), contrastive statements caused by contrastively stressing a constituent within their neutral pair sentences can evoke a set of alternatives for that position and the stress asserts that the selected one is the right choice out of the set. And this can also trigger an implicature that the alternative(s) of the set will not fit for the frame. Though contrastiveness caused by ‘contrastive stress’ seem to have the same scope with topic or focus, it is not always so. The prosodic nature of contrastive stress should be examined more carefully according to the informational nature of the linguistic units.

Citation status

* References for papers published after 2023 are currently being built.