Korean Semantics 2023 KCI Impact Factor : 1.11
-
pISSN : 1226-7198 / eISSN : 2734-0171
- https://journal.kci.go.kr/semantics
KJCKorea
Journal Central
A critique of recent formal semantic descriptions of ‘-teo -’ in Korean
- Korean Semantics
- 2020, 69(), pp.155-195
- DOI : 10.19033/sks.2020.9.69.155
- Publisher : The Society Of Korean Semantics
- Research Area : Humanities > Korean Language and Literature
- Received : August 20, 2020
- Accepted : September 18, 2020
- Published : September 30, 2020
1연세대학교
Accredited
ABSTRACT
I argue that the inflectional element ‘-teo-’ in Korean is an element essentially representing a modal meaning, rather than a marker for tense or a marker solely for evidentiality, and show that its semantic description contains an intensional function in terms of Kratzer’s(1981,1991) formal semantic theory of modality, and a definedness condition on the existence of the direct evidence about the preceding proposition. After discussing previous three different approaches, i.e., tense based, solely modal based, and solely evidential based ones, I show that my definition combining the modality and the presupposition of direct evidence enables capturing the various semantic constraints of ‘-teo-’ sentences. In particular, I show that there is a general semantic requirement of an epistemic modal element on the judge dependent elements and this requirement triggers to resolve the so-called 1st person restriction of ‘-teo-’ sentences.
Statistics
-
263 Viewed
-
1 Downloaded
Tools
Issue List
Citation status
* References for papers published after 2023 are currently being built.
[journal]
고영근
/ 1965
/ 현대국어 서법 체계에 대한 연구
/ 국어연구
/ 국어연구회
15
[journal]
김영희
/ 1981
/ 회상문의 인칭 제약과 책임성
/ 국어학
10
: 37~90
[journal]
남기심
/ 1972
/ 현대국어 시제에 관한 문제
/ 국어국문학
/ 합병호
55-57
: 213~238
[journal]
박재연
/ 1999
/ 한국어 양태 어미의 의미 연구: 인식 양태를 중심으로
/ 국어학
34
: 199~225
[thesis]
박재연
/ 2004
/ 한국어 양태 어미 연구
/ 박사
/ 서울대학교 대학원
[journal]
송재목
/ 1998
/ 안맺음씨끝 ‘-더-’의 의미기능에 대하여: 유형론적 관점에서
/ 국어학
32
: 135~169
[journal]
송재목
/ 2007
/
Typology of Evidentiality and Subject Restriction: based on Korean, Mongolian and Tibetan
/ 형태론
/ 형태론
9(1)
: 1~23
[journal]
송재목
/ 2009
/
Epistemic Modality and Evidentiality
/ 한국어학
/ 한국어학회
44
: 27~53
[journal]
양정석
/ 2008
/
The Morphosyntax of Temporal Elements in Korean.
/ 언어
/ 한국언어학회
33(4)
: 693~722
[book]
양정석
/ 2010
/ 한국어 통사구조와 시간 해석
/ 한국문화사
[journal]
양정석
/ 2012
/
Against ‘-neu-’ as a Grammatical Morpheme: Problems Surrounding ‘iss-’ and ‘eops-’
/ 한글
/ 한글학회
(296)
: 81~122
[journal]
양정석
/ 2015
/
Introducing Judge of Evaluation for the Analysis of Subjective Adjectival Predicates, Modals, and Evidentials in Korean
/ 언어와 정보
/ 한국언어정보학회
19(1)
: 119~146
[journal]
양정석
/ 2015
/
A Critique of Recent Formal Semantic Analyses of Temporal Elements in Korean
/ 배달말
/ 배달말학회
(56)
: 31~76
[book]
양정석
/ 2017
/ 주관적 판단의 문법: 주관성 형용사, 양상, 증거성
/ 한국문화사
[confproc]
양정석
/ 2018
/ 양상 요소로서의 ‘-더라’와 ‘-더냐’
/ 2018년 한국언어학회 여름연구회 주제발표 논문집
/ 사단법인 한국언어학회
[thesis]
이정미
/ 2011
/ Evidentiality and its Interaction with Tense: Evidence from Korean
/ Ph.D.
/ Ohio State University
[journal]
이정미
/ 2013
/ Temporal constraints on the meaning of evidentiality
/ Natural Language Semantics
21
: 1~41
[thesis]
이정민
/ 2014
/ Evidentiality and modals: what makes them unique
/ ms
/ Seoul National University
[journal]
이창덕
/ 1988
/ ‘더’에 관한 문제
/ 말
13
: 195~218
[thesis]
이효상
/ 1991
/ Tense, Aspect, Modality: A Discourse-pragmatic Analysis of Verbal Affixes in Korean from a Typological Perspective
/ Ph.D.
/ UCLA
[thesis]
임동식
/ 2010
/ Evidentials and Interrogatives: A Case Study fromKorean
/ Ph.D.
/ University of Southern California
[journal]
임동식
/ 2014
/
On the Interaction between Lexical Aspects of Predicates and Evidentiality - A situation-semantics account -
/ 언어학
/ 사단법인 한국언어학회
(70)
: 117~140
[confproc]
임동식
/ 2012
/ Perspective shifts of Korean evidentialsand the effect of contexts
/ Proceedings of SALT
22
: 26~42
[book]
장경희
/ 1985
/ 현대국어의 양태범주 연구
/ 탑출판사
[thesis]
정경숙
/ 2005
/ Space in Tense: The Interaction of Tense, Aspect,Evidentiality, and Speech Act in Korean
/ Ph.D.
/ Simon Fraser Univ.
[journal]
정경숙
/ 2007
/ Spatial deictic tense and evidentials in Korean
/ NaturalLanguage Semantics
15
: 187~219
[thesis]
崔東柱
/ 1995
/ 국어 시상체계의 통시적 변화에 관한 연구
/ 박사
/ 서울大學校 大學院
[book]
최현배
/ 1937
/ 우리말본
/ 연희전문출판부
[book]
한동완
/ 1996
/ 국어의 시제 연구
/ 태학사
[journal]
허세문
/ 2015
/
The 1st person restriction on Korean evidential marker ‘-te’: focusing on subject-oriented psych-predicates
/ 언어와 정보
/ 한국언어정보학회
19(2)
: 81~107
[book]
Grice, H. P.
/ 1975
/ Syntax & Semantics 3
/ Academic Press
: 41~58
[thesis]
Faller, M.
/ 2002
/ Semantics and Pragmatics of Evidentials in Cuzco Quechua
/ Ph.D.
/ Stanford University
[journal]
Hamblin, C.
/ 1973
/ Questions in Montague English
/ Foundations of Language
10
: 41~53
[book]
Heim, I.
/ 1998
/ Semantics in Generative Grammar
/ Blackwell
[journal]
Kalsang
/ 2013
/ Direct evidentials, case, tense and aspect in Tibetan: evidence for a general theory of the semantics of evidential
/ Natural Language and Linguistic Theory
31
: 517~561
[book]
Kaplan, D.
/ 1989
/ Themes from Kaplan
/ Oxford University Press
[book]
Kratzer, A.
/ 1981
/ Words, Worlds, and Contexts: New Approaches inWord Semantics
/ Mouton de Gruyter
: 38~74
[book]
Kratzer, A.
/ 1991
/ Semantics: AnInternational Handbook of Contemporary Research
/ de Gruyter
: 639~650
[book]
Kratzer, A.
/ 2007
/ Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
/ CSLI
[journal]
Lewis, D.
/ 1979
/ Attitudes De Dicto and De Se
/ Philosophical Review
88
: 513~543
[book]
Lewis, D.
/ 1979
/ Semantics from Different Points of View
/ Springer
[journal]
Matthewson, L.
/ 2007
/ Evidentials as epistemic modals: evidence from Sťáťimcets
/ Linguistic Variation Yearbook
7
: 201~254
[journal]
Portner, P.
/ 1998
/ The progressive in modal semantics
/ Language
74
: 760~787
[book]
Portner, P.
/ 2009
/ Modality
/ Oxford University Press