본문 바로가기
  • Home

The Governmentality of Emotion and the Ethics of Protection: A Cross-Cultural Analysis of Refugee Regimes in South Korea and Germany

  • The Journal of Multicultural Society
  • 2026, 19(1), pp.173~198
  • DOI : 10.14431/jms.2026.2.19.1.173
  • Publisher : Research Institute of Asian Women
  • Research Area : Social Science > Social Science in general
  • Received : December 15, 2025
  • Accepted : February 5, 2026
  • Published : February 28, 2026

이준상 1 이은정 2

1베를린 자유대학교 동아시아 대학원
2서울대학교

Accredited

ABSTRACT

This study comparatively analyzes the asylum systems of South Korea and Germany based on in-depth interviews with five Myanmar migrants who applied for asylum following the military coup in Myanmar in 2021. Drawing on a qualitative comparative approach, the study examines how asylum regimes operate not only as legal and administrative frameworks but also as technologies of governance through which emotion is embedded in the language of state ethics and institutional practice. Focusing on the institutionalized emotional structures surrounding eligibility for protection, the study shows that South Korea and Germany formalize the governance of emotion in distinct ways. In South Korea, the asylum system produces what can be described as “authorized precarity” through administrative ambiguity and an affective politics of relational trust. In contrast, the German welfare state institutionalizes “selective protection” by embedding meritocratic evaluations and hierarchies of moral emotion within its protection regime. Although these two systems are shaped by different social and historical conditions, they are complementary in that both mobilize emotion as a criterion for state morality and human potential. This study conceptualizes this complementary form of governance as the “governmentality of emotion” and argues for a shift from protection governed by emotion toward a politics of potentiality. It emphasizes the need to reconfigure emotion not as a mechanism of exclusion but as an ethical resource for restoring human dignity and mutual care.

Citation status

* References for papers published after 2024 are currently being built.