@article{ART001827588},
author={Minheejoo},
title={The composition of DongMyung and Sukjun Park Han Yeong’s “SukRimHanHwa”},
journal={Journal of Humanities, Seoul National University},
issn={1598-3021},
year={2013},
number={70},
pages={297-323},
doi={10.17326/jhsnu..70.201312.297}
TY - JOUR
AU - Minheejoo
TI - The composition of DongMyung and Sukjun Park Han Yeong’s “SukRimHanHwa”
JO - Journal of Humanities, Seoul National University
PY - 2013
VL - null
IS - 70
PB - Institute of Humanities, Seoul National University
SP - 297
EP - 323
SN - 1598-3021
AB - This article will look at the overall composition of DongMyung, a magazine from the early 1920s and through Sukjun Park Han Yeong’s article from this magazine we will try to find a sketch of the creation of the modern age from a Buddhist perspective. First, we will look at how DongMyung tried to establish the state of the 1920s and how it distinguished the changes that occurred from five perspectives: the people, origination, current affairs, new knowledge, and literature. Through this we can see that while the 1920s introduction of ethics and the study of the reconstruction of humanity was popular and the inflow of socialism was vigorous, DongMyung handled articles about the tendencies of that time.
The concept of the magazine was affected by Sukjun’s article of his Buddhist view of the world. Taking lead of the current flow of the time, magazines tried to take in new knowledge and new culture as a medium, and Sukjun’s thorough Buddhist view of the world as a writer was characteristic as well as having the reader being irrelevant to a certain color of any religion. This composition was hard to see in any other magazine. We can guess the possibility of the magazine’s viewpoint by showing modernization from a perspective different to that of the universal perception of the time. In this perspective Sukjun states that through introspection with the foundation of the Buddhist speculation system we can take action against modernization. Furthermore, he states that it is an indicator of ‘how we should live’. He criticizes and warns against modernism as well as acceptance of it. This action of maintaining the position of a Buddhist and independently accepting modernism shows an aspect of his character.
KW - 1920s modern literature;DongMyung;modern mass media;modernization;Buddhism discussion;Sukjun ParkHanYeong
DO - 10.17326/jhsnu..70.201312.297
ER -
Minheejoo. (2013). The composition of DongMyung and Sukjun Park Han Yeong’s “SukRimHanHwa”. Journal of Humanities, Seoul National University, 70, 297-323.
Minheejoo. 2013, "The composition of DongMyung and Sukjun Park Han Yeong’s “SukRimHanHwa”", Journal of Humanities, Seoul National University, no.70, pp.297-323. Available from: doi:10.17326/jhsnu..70.201312.297
Minheejoo "The composition of DongMyung and Sukjun Park Han Yeong’s “SukRimHanHwa”" Journal of Humanities, Seoul National University 70 pp.297-323 (2013) : 297.
Minheejoo. The composition of DongMyung and Sukjun Park Han Yeong’s “SukRimHanHwa”. 2013; 70 : 297-323. Available from: doi:10.17326/jhsnu..70.201312.297
Minheejoo. "The composition of DongMyung and Sukjun Park Han Yeong’s “SukRimHanHwa”" Journal of Humanities, Seoul National University no.70(2013) : 297-323.doi: 10.17326/jhsnu..70.201312.297
Minheejoo. The composition of DongMyung and Sukjun Park Han Yeong’s “SukRimHanHwa”. Journal of Humanities, Seoul National University, 70, 297-323. doi: 10.17326/jhsnu..70.201312.297
Minheejoo. The composition of DongMyung and Sukjun Park Han Yeong’s “SukRimHanHwa”. Journal of Humanities, Seoul National University. 2013; 70 297-323. doi: 10.17326/jhsnu..70.201312.297
Minheejoo. The composition of DongMyung and Sukjun Park Han Yeong’s “SukRimHanHwa”. 2013; 70 : 297-323. Available from: doi:10.17326/jhsnu..70.201312.297
Minheejoo. "The composition of DongMyung and Sukjun Park Han Yeong’s “SukRimHanHwa”" Journal of Humanities, Seoul National University no.70(2013) : 297-323.doi: 10.17326/jhsnu..70.201312.297
