KJCKorea
Journal Central

@article{ART001901648},
author={Kim keonhee},
title={The Re-examination of Coordination and Subordination},
journal={Journal of Humanities, Seoul National University},
issn={1598-3021},
year={2014},
volume={71},
number={3},
pages={117-157},
doi={10.17326/jhsnu.71.3.201408.117}

TY - JOUR
AU - Kim keonhee
TI - The Re-examination of Coordination and Subordination
JO - Journal of Humanities, Seoul National University
PY - 2014
VL - 71
IS - 3
PB - Institute of Humanities, Seoul National University
SP - 117
EP - 157
SN - 1598-3021
AB - The aims of this study are to re-examine the distinction between coordinationand subordination by studying the previous criteria (comprising‘symmetry’, ‘movement’, ‘anaphora’, and ‘the topic particle -nun’) and topropose a new perspective on coordination and subordination based oncomplex sentences which illustrate the focus and contrast of semanticpragmatics. In this study, the coordination and subordination of the complexsentences are examined in particular by the universal coordinative/subordinative standard, ‘shared tense’ and ‘(non-)switch reference’. As ‘-ci’ subordinative sentences show subordinaton according to thelanguage typological coordinative/subordinative standard of shared tenseand (non-)switch reference, the ‘-ci’ sentence, which is a traditional ‘focusand contrast’ sentence, can be seen to show subordination. The ‘or’ coordinativesentences (focus and contrast) show coordination from the viewof symmetry, and subordination from the view of (non-)switch reference. In previous studies, such as Lee (1995), Sohn (1999), it has been assertedthat the distinction between coordination and subordination is the matter of degree. This position is further developed in this study by concretelyexplaining, according to a new distinction criteria, the degrees required forsubordination vis-à-vis coordination. Consequently there exists flexibility,not dichotomy, in the relationship between coordination and subordination.
KW - Coordination;subordination. symmetry;focus;contrast;shared tense;(non-)switch reference
DO - 10.17326/jhsnu.71.3.201408.117
ER -

Kim keonhee. (2014). The Re-examination of Coordination and Subordination. Journal of Humanities, Seoul National University, 71(3), 117-157.

Kim keonhee. 2014, "The Re-examination of Coordination and Subordination", Journal of Humanities, Seoul National University, vol.71, no.3 pp.117-157. Available from: doi:10.17326/jhsnu.71.3.201408.117

Kim keonhee "The Re-examination of Coordination and Subordination" Journal of Humanities, Seoul National University 71.3 pp.117-157 (2014) : 117.

Kim keonhee. The Re-examination of Coordination and Subordination. 2014; 71(3), 117-157. Available from: doi:10.17326/jhsnu.71.3.201408.117

Kim keonhee. "The Re-examination of Coordination and Subordination" Journal of Humanities, Seoul National University 71, no.3 (2014) : 117-157.doi: 10.17326/jhsnu.71.3.201408.117

Kim keonhee. The Re-examination of Coordination and Subordination. Journal of Humanities, Seoul National University, 71(3), 117-157. doi: 10.17326/jhsnu.71.3.201408.117

Kim keonhee. The Re-examination of Coordination and Subordination. Journal of Humanities, Seoul National University. 2014; 71(3) 117-157. doi: 10.17326/jhsnu.71.3.201408.117

Kim keonhee. The Re-examination of Coordination and Subordination. 2014; 71(3), 117-157. Available from: doi:10.17326/jhsnu.71.3.201408.117

Kim keonhee. "The Re-examination of Coordination and Subordination" Journal of Humanities, Seoul National University 71, no.3 (2014) : 117-157.doi: 10.17326/jhsnu.71.3.201408.117