@article{ART002528672},
author={hwanginsok},
title={Karatani Kojin’s Interpretation of Ito Jinsai: Focused on the Critic of ‘Immanence = Transcendence’ Concept},
journal={Journal of Humanities, Seoul National University},
issn={1598-3021},
year={2019},
volume={76},
number={4},
pages={295-324},
doi={10.17326/jhsnu.76.4.201911.295}
TY - JOUR
AU - hwanginsok
TI - Karatani Kojin’s Interpretation of Ito Jinsai: Focused on the Critic of ‘Immanence = Transcendence’ Concept
JO - Journal of Humanities, Seoul National University
PY - 2019
VL - 76
IS - 4
PB - Institute of Humanities, Seoul National University
SP - 295
EP - 324
SN - 1598-3021
AB - It is noted that the ‘Immanence = Transcendence’ concept is a characteristic of Eastern Philosophy⋅Ethics. However, according to Karatani Kojin, that concept is not that exceptional but in fact is associated with a long legacy of western idealism. Karatani calls the structure of philosophical argument ‘solipsism’. The critical characteristic of the solipsism is an attitude that the one which is correct to me is always correct to the other. On solipsism, ‘the other’ who should be subject to ethical consideration subordinates to the circuit of ‘generality – specificity’, so in the end, it is treated as a being that is not different from ‘I’. Karatani notices Wittgenstein’s late language philosophy in order to overcome that kind of philosophical problem. Furthermore, Karatani notes that there are linguistic and ethical transformations, such as Wittgenstein in the criticism of Ito Jinsai’s Neo-Confucianism. While criticizing Neo-Confucianism, Ito Jinsai’s perception of emphasizing on virtue practice and teaching comes from the dialogue and ironic reality of the text of “The Analects”.
KW - Ito Jinsai;Neo-Confucianism;Colipsism;The Other;Karatani Kojin
DO - 10.17326/jhsnu.76.4.201911.295
ER -
hwanginsok. (2019). Karatani Kojin’s Interpretation of Ito Jinsai: Focused on the Critic of ‘Immanence = Transcendence’ Concept. Journal of Humanities, Seoul National University, 76(4), 295-324.
hwanginsok. 2019, "Karatani Kojin’s Interpretation of Ito Jinsai: Focused on the Critic of ‘Immanence = Transcendence’ Concept", Journal of Humanities, Seoul National University, vol.76, no.4 pp.295-324. Available from: doi:10.17326/jhsnu.76.4.201911.295
hwanginsok "Karatani Kojin’s Interpretation of Ito Jinsai: Focused on the Critic of ‘Immanence = Transcendence’ Concept" Journal of Humanities, Seoul National University 76.4 pp.295-324 (2019) : 295.
hwanginsok. Karatani Kojin’s Interpretation of Ito Jinsai: Focused on the Critic of ‘Immanence = Transcendence’ Concept. 2019; 76(4), 295-324. Available from: doi:10.17326/jhsnu.76.4.201911.295
hwanginsok. "Karatani Kojin’s Interpretation of Ito Jinsai: Focused on the Critic of ‘Immanence = Transcendence’ Concept" Journal of Humanities, Seoul National University 76, no.4 (2019) : 295-324.doi: 10.17326/jhsnu.76.4.201911.295
hwanginsok. Karatani Kojin’s Interpretation of Ito Jinsai: Focused on the Critic of ‘Immanence = Transcendence’ Concept. Journal of Humanities, Seoul National University, 76(4), 295-324. doi: 10.17326/jhsnu.76.4.201911.295
hwanginsok. Karatani Kojin’s Interpretation of Ito Jinsai: Focused on the Critic of ‘Immanence = Transcendence’ Concept. Journal of Humanities, Seoul National University. 2019; 76(4) 295-324. doi: 10.17326/jhsnu.76.4.201911.295
hwanginsok. Karatani Kojin’s Interpretation of Ito Jinsai: Focused on the Critic of ‘Immanence = Transcendence’ Concept. 2019; 76(4), 295-324. Available from: doi:10.17326/jhsnu.76.4.201911.295
hwanginsok. "Karatani Kojin’s Interpretation of Ito Jinsai: Focused on the Critic of ‘Immanence = Transcendence’ Concept" Journal of Humanities, Seoul National University 76, no.4 (2019) : 295-324.doi: 10.17326/jhsnu.76.4.201911.295
