본문 바로가기
  • Home

May 16 as an Extension of April 19: Discourse on the May 16 Coup as a Revolution in the Early 1960s

  • Journal of Humanities, Seoul National University
  • 2026, 83(1), pp.475~510
  • Publisher : Institute of Humanities, Seoul National University
  • Research Area : Humanities > Other Humanities
  • Received : January 12, 2026
  • Accepted : February 8, 2026
  • Published : February 28, 2026

Byeon Seong Ho 1

1조선대학교

Accredited

ABSTRACT

The May 16 event was a military coup, yet it was perceived as a “revolution” by many Koreans in the early 1960s. Since the April Revolution, the military had been understood as a part of and a contributor to the ‘revolution’, and May 16 occurred amidst public disappointment and dissatisfaction caused by the misgovernance of the Second Republic. Regarding May 16, which had advocated the name “Military Revolution” from the beginning, many students, scholars, journalists, and even some politicians viewed it as an event that could complete the unfinished April 19 Revolution. Pledges promising a swift transition to civilian rule fostered such beliefs. May 16 was able to strengthen its claim as a revolution by utilizing the revolutionary discourse of the preceding April 19 “revolution”. While the intellectual class in 1961 supported May 16 as a revolution, they did not naively expect the military to resolve Korea’s various chronic problems in the short term. The discourse of the May 16 Revolution in the early 1960s cannot be judged solely by coercion from above; it was a product of the era, formed by a combination of economic dissatisfaction after April 19, a sense of security crisis, distrust of established politicians, and trust in the military.

Citation status

* References for papers published after 2024 are currently being built.