@article{ART001025449},
author={Jae-Ho Kim},
title={An Examination of the Multi-functional Administrative City Law from the Standpoint of Real Property Administrative Law},
journal={Public Land Law Review},
issn={1226-251X},
year={2007},
volume={38},
pages={39-65}
TY - JOUR
AU - Jae-Ho Kim
TI - An Examination of the Multi-functional Administrative City Law from the Standpoint of Real Property Administrative Law
JO - Public Land Law Review
PY - 2007
VL - 38
IS - null
PB - Korean Public Land Law Association
SP - 39
EP - 65
SN - 1226-251X
AB -
KW -
DO -
UR -
ER -
Jae-Ho Kim. (2007). An Examination of the Multi-functional Administrative City Law from the Standpoint of Real Property Administrative Law. Public Land Law Review, 38, 39-65.
Jae-Ho Kim. 2007, "An Examination of the Multi-functional Administrative City Law from the Standpoint of Real Property Administrative Law", Public Land Law Review, vol.38, pp.39-65.
Jae-Ho Kim "An Examination of the Multi-functional Administrative City Law from the Standpoint of Real Property Administrative Law" Public Land Law Review 38 pp.39-65 (2007) : 39.
Jae-Ho Kim. An Examination of the Multi-functional Administrative City Law from the Standpoint of Real Property Administrative Law. 2007; 38 39-65.
Jae-Ho Kim. "An Examination of the Multi-functional Administrative City Law from the Standpoint of Real Property Administrative Law" Public Land Law Review 38(2007) : 39-65.
Jae-Ho Kim. An Examination of the Multi-functional Administrative City Law from the Standpoint of Real Property Administrative Law. Public Land Law Review, 38, 39-65.
Jae-Ho Kim. An Examination of the Multi-functional Administrative City Law from the Standpoint of Real Property Administrative Law. Public Land Law Review. 2007; 38 39-65.
Jae-Ho Kim. An Examination of the Multi-functional Administrative City Law from the Standpoint of Real Property Administrative Law. 2007; 38 39-65.
Jae-Ho Kim. "An Examination of the Multi-functional Administrative City Law from the Standpoint of Real Property Administrative Law" Public Land Law Review 38(2007) : 39-65.
