Judicial Review to Agency Interpretation of Statutes (미국 행정법상 행정기관의 제정법 해석에 대한 사법심사 )

Dongsoo Lee (이동수)

Judicial Review to Agency Interpretation of Statutes

Public Land Law Review
Abbr : KPLLR
2009, 46(), pp.319-338
Publisher : Korean Public Land Law Association
Research Area : Social Science > Law

Dongsoo Lee ¹

¹대구가톨릭대학교

Accredited

ABSTRACT

Every agency decision must be anchored in the language of one or more statutes the agency is charged to implement. Every agency-administered statutes contains ambiguities. It is impossible to draft a statute with sufficient precision and foresight to resolve each of the hundreds of issues that are likely to arise during the life of the statutes. Two institutions play major roles in giving meaning to agency-administered. ①In NLRB v. Hearst Publication, 322 U.S. 111(1944), the Court affirmed a decision that agency's construction of statute, it is required to implement muse be a reasonable basis of law. ② In NLRB v. Bell Aerospace, 416 U.S 267(1974), Court ignored the agency's construction of its statutes and substituted the court's independent construction for that of the agency. By the way, The Court announced the abandonment of its traditional treatment of agency constructions of agency-administered statutes in Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense council, 467 U.S. 837(1984). Chevron is one of the most important decision in the history of administrative law. Chevron's presumption regarding the appropriate institutional locale for policy implementation in the face of statutory silence creates significant ambiguity of its own. Specially, it leaves unclear which of the interpretive tools traditionally need by judges to guide their independent judgment about the best construction of statute survives circumscription of the judicial interpretive role.

KEYWORDS

사법적 신뢰의 법리(rule of deference : Chevron's deference), 규범적 해석기준(normative canon), 명백한 진술의 법리(clear statement principle), 권한위임금지의 법리(non-delegation doctrine), 헌법상문제의 회피기준(avoidance canon), 합리성 법리(reasonable test)

Citation status

* References for papers published after 2023 are currently being built.

[book] Breyer S. G / 2002 / Administrative Law and Regulatory Policy-Problems, Text and Cases-5th ed / Aspen Law & Business

[book] Davis K. C / 2000 / Administrative Law Treatise I, 3d ed / Little Brown & Co.

[journal] Bamberger K. A / 2008 / Normative Canons in the Review of Administrative Policymaking / Yale L. J.

[journal] Breyer S. G / 1992 / On the Uses of Legislative History in Interpreting Statutes / Univ. of Southern California L. Rev 65

[other] Diver S. C / 1985 / Statutory Interpretation in the Administrative State / 113 Univ. of Pennsylvania L. Rev

[journal] Eskridge, Jr., W. N / 1992 / Quasi-Constitutional Law : Clear Statement Rules as Constitutional Lawmaking / Vanderbilt L. Rev 45

[journal] Fallon, Jr., R. H / 1997 / The Supreme Court, 1996 Term-Foreword : implementing the Constitution / Harvard L. Rev 111

[journal] Farima C. R / 1989 / Statutory Interpretation and the Balance of Power in the Administrative State / Columbia L. Rev 89

[journal] Manning J. F / Driving Rules of Statutory Interpretation from the Constitution / Columbia L. Rev 101

[journal] Manning J. F / 2003 / The Absurdity Doctrine / Harvard L. Rev

[journal] Nelson C / 2007 / Statutory Interpretation and Decision Theory / Univ. of Chicago L. Rev 74

[journal] Sunstein C. R / 1989 / Interpreting Statutes in the Regulatory State / Harvard L. Rev 103

[journal] Sunstein C. R / 1990 / Law and Administration After Chevron / Columbia L. Rev 90

[journal] Sunstein C. R / 2000 / Nondelegation Canons / Univ. of Chicago L. Rev 67

[journal] 이동수 / 1998 / 미국에서의 규제행정법의 해석 / 공법연구 26(3)

KJCKorea
Journal Central

Public Land Law Review 2023 KCI Impact Factor : 1.14