Congressional Control on Administrative Rulemaking in American Administrative Law (미국 행정법상 행정기관의 규칙제정에 대한 의회의 통제 )

Dongsoo Lee (이동수)

Congressional Control on Administrative Rulemaking in American Administrative Law

Public Land Law Review
Abbr : KPLLR
2011, 54(), pp.245-265
Publisher : Korean Public Land Law Association
Research Area : Social Science > Law

Dongsoo Lee ¹

¹대구가톨릭대학교

Accredited

ABSTRACT

Congress enjoys the ability to delegate significant tasks to agencies but does not have unlimited control over decisions that those agencies subsequently make. The following inventory setting forth some of the more prominent oversight tools currently used by Congress. ① Committee hearings ② The Congressional Review Act of 1996③ Appropriations riders ④ Congressional Budget Office(CBO), etc. For the sake of avoid oversight of Congress agency wants use of “Guidance Documents”. But guidance documents often come in a variety of formats and names, including interpretive memoranda, policy statements, manuals, bulletins etc., but are not limited to, agency interpretations or policies. Guidance documents differ from legislative rules in three major ways :① Procedural requirements for issuance ② Legal effects both inside and outside the agency ③ Availability and scope of judicial review In order to measure whether agency leaders use guidance documents to circumvent the rulemaking process. We must determine whether they issue guidance strategically. The account below is then empirically tested to determine whether agency leaders use guidance strategically. ① Congressional and presidential preference ② Alignment of political principals ③ Judicial challenge ④ Difference in level of procedural constraints ⑤ Durability ⑥ Enforceability ⑦ Budget etc.

KEYWORDS

행정국가(guidance documents), Chadha판결(legislative veto), 입법적 거부권, 연방행정절차법, 청문 및 결정절차(administrative state), 고지 및 진술절차(legislative rule), 입법적 규칙(interpetative rule), 해석적 규칙(Administrative Procedure Act(APA)), 지침서(rulemaking)

Citation status

* References for papers published after 2023 are currently being built.

[other] 정하명 / 2009 / 미국연방의회에 의한 행정입법통제를 중심으로 / 국회의 행정입법통제에 관한 연구, 국회ㆍ유럽헌법학회

[book] Craig P. P. / 1983 / Administrative Law / Sweet & Maxwell

[book] Rosenbloom D. H. / 1994 / Contemporary Public Administration / McGraw-Hill

[journal] Andersen W. R. / 2002 / Informal Agency Advice-Graphing the Critical Analysis / Admin. L. Rev 54

[journal] Anthony R. A. / 1992 / Interpretative Rules, Policy Statements, Guidance, Manuals, and the Like-Should Federal Agencies Use Them To Bind the Public / Duke L. J 41

[journal] Beermanm J. M. / 2006 / Congressional Administration / San Diego L. Rev 43

[journal] Bruff H. H. / 1977 / Congressional Control of Administrative Regulation : A Study of Legislative Vetoes / Harvard L. Rev 90

[journal] Cohen D. / 1997 / Regulatory Reform 104th Congress : Congressional Review of Agency Regulations / Admin. L. Rev 49

[book] Congressional Quarterly Inc / 1983 / Regulation-Process and Politics / Government Printing Office

[journal] Funk W. / 2001 / A Primer on Nonlegislative Rules / Admin. L. Rev 53

[journal] Funk W. / 2002 / When Is a Rule a Regulation? Marking a Clear Line Between Nonlegislative Rules and Legislative Rules / Admin. L. Rev 54

[journal] Funk W. / 2004 / Legislating / Admin. L. Rev 56

[journal] Gazell J. A. / 1987 / Voiding the Legislative Veto : Passible Impacts for the Administrative State / Grandale L. Rev 7

[journal] Johnson S. M. / 2007 / Good Guidance, Good Grief! / Mo. L. Rev 72

[journal] Mendelson N. A. / 2007 / Regulatory Beneficiaries and Informal Agency Rulemaking / Cornell L. Rev 92

[journal] Note / 2007 / Oversight and Insight : Legislative Review of Agency and from the States / Harvard L. Rev 121

[journal] Pierce R. J. Jr. / 1991 / The Unintended Effects of Judicial Review of Agency Rules : How Federal Courts Have Contributed to the Electricity Crisis of the 1990s / Admin. L. Rev 43

[journal] Pierce R. J. Jr. / 2000 / Distinguishing Legislative Rules from Interpretative Rules / Admin. L. Rev 52

[journal] Posner R. A. / 1997 / The Rise and Fall of Administrative Law / Chicago Kent L. Rev 72

[journal] Raso C. N. / 2010 / Strategic or Sincere? Analysing Agency Use of Guidanc Documents / Yale L. J 119

[journal] Seidenfeld M. / 2000 / A Table of Requirements for Federal Administrative Rulemaking / Fla. State Univ. L. Rev 27

[journal] Strauss P. L. / 1992 / The Rulemaking Continuum / Duke L. J 41

KJCKorea
Journal Central

Public Land Law Review 2023 KCI Impact Factor : 1.14