Reconsideration of Compesation for Premium in Urban-Rehabilitation Project Based on Legislation for Premium (상가권리금 법제화에 따른 도시정비사업상 권리금 보상의 재검토)

NO HANJANG (노한장)

Reconsideration of Compesation for Premium in Urban-Rehabilitation Project Based on Legislation for Premium

Public Land Law Review
Abbr : KPLLR
2015, 72(), pp.259-282
Publisher : Korean Public Land Law Association
Research Area : Social Science > Law

NO HANJANG ¹

¹국민연금공단

Accredited

ABSTRACT

Premium for commercial buildings is a widely spread business practice that it has long been taken for granted in usual activated business area. The amount of premium for commercial buildings in Korea has been put at around 30 trillion won. Regardless of its practical substance and important function in the economy of ordinary people, give-and take of premium has been left exclusively from legal protection in the name of principle of private autonomy because there has been no positive laws regarding premium. Accordingly, premium for retail buildings has been treated case by case by commercial customs and judicial precedents until the amended Commercial Building Lease Protection Act(2015.5.13.) what is called Protection Act for Premium was executed. Legislation for premium through incorporating into the legal system has special meaning and historical significance in that It does consolidate the protection of lessees’ premium recovery. However, the purpose of amended Commercial Building Lease Protection Act was to further protect lessees’ premium withdrall just in the private judicial area that it contains various limitations in the area of public compensation for premium. Above all, current judicial legal system doesn’t accept the compensation for premium in the process of urban-rehabilitation project yet despite the legislation of premium for commercial buildings. The absence of positive law about compensation for premium in expropriation, use or restriction of private property from public necessity is also important limitation because Constitution of the Republic of Korea(Article 23) adopt the ‘Junktim-Klausel’ for guarantee of property rights. To remedy current unconstitutional situation above mentioned, this study suggests some legislative improvement approaches as follow: Firstly, it need to recognize based on new perspective that premium come under guarantee of property rights. Second, the compensation code for infringement of lessees’ commercial premium by expropriation, use or restriction of private property from public necessity should be specified on the positive law. Finally, the concrete criterion for premium appraisal need to be established to protect lessees’ reasonable compensation as a fundamental human rights.

KEYWORDS

premium, legislation, urban-rehabilitation project, reparation for premium, specify compensation code

Citation status

* References for papers published after 2023 are currently being built.

[journal] 경국현 / 2012 / A Review of Shop Key Money based on Market Relationship / 부동산연구 / 한국부동산연구원 22(1) : 145~171

[book] 권영성 / 2009 / 헌법학원론 / 법문사 : 345~348

[book] 김연태 / 2012 / 행정법 I (제16판) / 법문사 : 623~624

[book] 김동희 / 2010 / 행정법 I / 박영사 : 573~574

[journal] 김민주 / 2015 / Study of Business Compensation for Building Premium by Legislation of Public Law / 아주법학 / 법학연구소 8(4) : 345~382

[book] 김영두 / 2009 / 상가점포의 권리금에 관한 연구 / 법무부 : 9~11

[journal] 김웅 / 2015 / The study on the commercial premium contract parties / 감정평가학논집 / 한국감정평가학회 14(1) : 13~24

[report] 김정욱 / 2011 / 권리금에 대한 법경제학적 접근 / KDI : 1~90

[book] 김준호 / 2013 / 민법강의 / 법문사 : 1687~

[book] 김학성 / 2012 / 헌법학원론 / 박영사 : 446~447

[book] 민태욱 / 2014 / 부동산사법(제4판) / 부연사 : 224~226

[journal] 민태욱 / 2014 / The Essence of Foregift and Public Law Solution / 토지공법연구 / 한국토지공법학회 66 : 515~535

[journal] 백성준 / 2014 / 시장관계성에 근거한 권리금 정책수립에 관한 소고 / 부동산 포커스 71 : 1~10

[journal] 소재선 / 1997 / 비교법적 측면에서 본 점포임대차법안의 문제점과 입법과제 / 경희법학 32(1) : 151~158

[book] 양건 / 2012 / 헌법강의 / 법문사 : 583~588

[journal] 이재우 / 2014 / 도시재생 활성화와 감정평가업계 참여방안 / 감정평가 (112) : 8~17

[book] 이충훈 / 2009 / 상가임대차 권리금 계약에 관한 현황과 정책방향 / 국회입법조사처 : 40~42

[journal] 정주희 / 2010 / A Study on Improvements for Problems in the Legal System of Tenant Protection Plans in Urban Renewal Projects / 부동산학연구 / 한국부동산분석학회 16(3) : 133~150

[book] 지원림 / 2007 / 민법강의 / 홍문사 : 1267~

[report] 차상원 / 2011 / 시산가격 조정에 관한 연구 / 한국감정원·부동산연구원 : 14~16

[journal] 하창효 / 2013 / The Fore-gift as a Just Compensation in Case of Expropriation / 감정평가학논집 / 한국감정평가학회 12(2) : 83~97

[journal] 허강무 / 2014 / 정비사업 상가 권리금 보상의 공법적 검토 / 부동산 포커스 71

[book] 홍정선 / 2012 / 행정법특강 / 박영사 : 510~514

[book] Robinson, Jeremy Rowan / 1995 / Compulsory Purchase and Compensation / Sweet & Maxwell : 197~

[other] 국회 의안정보시스템 / 상가건물임대차보호법 일부개정법률안(대안)

[other] / 2014 / 국회 의안정보시스템 법제사법위원회 제332회-법제사법소위제1차 회의록(2014.4.24.)

[other] / 국회 의안정보시스템 의안번호 제199139호, 1912371호, 1912516, 1915014호

[other] / 2015 / 국회 의안정보시스템 법사위 법안심사소위원회 제330회 제2차 회의록, 2015.1.8

[web] / 대법원 2002. 7. 26. 선고 2002다25013 판결 / http://glaw.scourt.go.kr

[other] / 2001 / 대법원 2001.4.10.선고 2000다95050 판결

[other] / 2001 / 헌재 2001. 6. 28. 99헌바106 / 판례집 13-1 : 1316~1317

[other] / 2010 / 헌재 2010.2.25. 2008헌바6 / 판례집 22-1상 : 161~

[other] / 1996 / 헌재 1996. 8. 29. 95헌바36 / 판례집 8-2 : 90~103

[other] / 2014 / 관계부처 합동 “장년층 고용안정 및 자영업자 대책 발표 / 보도자료 2014.9.24.

[other] 국토교통부 / 2015 / ‘권리금 감정평가 기준’고시 6월 11일부터 시행 / 보도참고자료 2015.6.11.

[other] 기획재정부 / 2014 / 관계부처 합동 “장년층 고용안정 및 자영업자 대책 Q&A” / 보도자료, 2014.9.24

[other] 국토교통부 / 2015 / 권리금 감정평가 기준 고시, 6월 11일부터 시행 / 보도자료 2015.6.11.

[other] 매경이코노미 / 2013 / 부동산 바닥에도 끊이지 않는 권리금 분쟁…창업 수요 느는데 입지는 없어 권리금 폭발 / 매경이코노미, 제1710호 2013.6.10.

[other] 머니투데이 / 2014 / ‘용산참사’ 근본 원인도 ‘상가권리금’ / 2014.01.29

[other] 문화일보 / 2015 / 권리금 회수 못할 땐 건물主 상대로 반환소 가능…재건축 이유/‘‘비워달라’ 할땐 보호 못받아 논란 / 2015.6.5

[other] 서울경제 / 2014 / ‘상가 권리금 보호 대책’, 재개발·재건축은 왜 빠졌나 / 2014.9.25

[other] 중앙일보 / 2015 / 영화 ‘국제시장’ 떴는데 ‘꽃분이네’는 짐을 쌉니다 / 2015.01.28.

[report] / 2014 / 자영업자 경쟁력 강화방안 연구, 정책보고서 / 소상공인시장진흥공단 : 99~108

KJCKorea
Journal Central

Public Land Law Review 2023 KCI Impact Factor : 1.14