KJCKorea
Journal Central

@article{ART002108807},
author={Kim, Sung-Bae},
title={A Study of Land Use Planning and Public Facilities Policy of Oregon State},
journal={Public Land Law Review},
issn={1226-251X},
year={2016},
volume={74},
pages={1-24}

TY - JOUR
AU - Kim, Sung-Bae
TI - A Study of Land Use Planning and Public Facilities Policy of Oregon State
JO - Public Land Law Review
PY - 2016
VL - 74
IS - null
PB - Korean Public Land Law Association
SP - 1
EP - 24
SN - 1226-251X
AB - Controlling land use and environmental protection in Korea are viewed as a different government regulation so that the plans of land control and environment have not matched at all. Oregon is known for the environmental model of U.S and one of first states adopts statewide land controlling system and urban growth boundaries which is a similar land use regulation (development restriction belt) in Korea. In 1973 Senate Bill 100 established the Land Conservation and Development Commission (LCDC) composed of seven members appointed to staggered, four-year terms by the Governor and confirmed by the Senate to supervise the Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD). Urban and rural development shall be guided and supported by types and levels of urban and rural public facilities and services appropriate for, but limited to, the needs and requirements of the urban, urbanizable and rural areas to be served. A provision for key facilities shall be included in each plan. To meet current and long-range needs, a provision for solid waste disposal sites, including sites for inert waste, shall be included in each plan. The more difficult question of interpretation lay ahead. While the goal established infrastructure planning as a priority, it dealt with neither the levels of service to be provided for various uses, nor the timing of infrastructure with regard to development. For forty years, Oregon has combined land use planning with the provision of infrastructure, through the adoption of Statewide Planning Goal 11 and its implementing rules, and through a host of other statutes, goals and rules all tending to assure that the land uses desired by citizens of the state are supported by necessary infrastructure. That relationship is important-- development does not follow from public improvement decisions; instead, public improvements follow from, and reinforce, the decisions to plan for land uses. The types and levels of infrastructure also reinforce the division between urban and rural areas, so that public dollars may be spent more wisely. Moreover, the coordination of the plans and actions of those public agencies responsible for supplying infrastructure allow the state to be more competitive in attracting commerce, industry and employment.
KW - Land use regulation;environment plan;public facilities;US land regulation;Oregon land use regulation;Urban development
DO -
UR -
ER -

Kim, Sung-Bae. (2016). A Study of Land Use Planning and Public Facilities Policy of Oregon State. Public Land Law Review, 74, 1-24.

Kim, Sung-Bae. 2016, "A Study of Land Use Planning and Public Facilities Policy of Oregon State", Public Land Law Review, vol.74, pp.1-24.

Kim, Sung-Bae "A Study of Land Use Planning and Public Facilities Policy of Oregon State" Public Land Law Review 74 pp.1-24 (2016) : 1.

Kim, Sung-Bae. A Study of Land Use Planning and Public Facilities Policy of Oregon State. 2016; 74 1-24.

Kim, Sung-Bae. "A Study of Land Use Planning and Public Facilities Policy of Oregon State" Public Land Law Review 74(2016) : 1-24.

Kim, Sung-Bae. A Study of Land Use Planning and Public Facilities Policy of Oregon State. Public Land Law Review, 74, 1-24.

Kim, Sung-Bae. A Study of Land Use Planning and Public Facilities Policy of Oregon State. Public Land Law Review. 2016; 74 1-24.

Kim, Sung-Bae. A Study of Land Use Planning and Public Facilities Policy of Oregon State. 2016; 74 1-24.

Kim, Sung-Bae. "A Study of Land Use Planning and Public Facilities Policy of Oregon State" Public Land Law Review 74(2016) : 1-24.