A Comparative Study on the Effect of Design Thinking Mindset Acquisition - Focusing on Offline and Online Learning - (디자인씽킹 마인드셋 습득효과 비교연구 - 오프라인학습과 온라인학습을 중심으로 -)

Ryu, Sun Joo (유선주)

doi:10.25111/jcd.2020.73.17

A Comparative Study on the Effect of Design Thinking Mindset Acquisition - Focusing on Offline and Online Learning -

Journal of Communication Design
Abbr : JCD
2020, 73(), pp.231-244
DOI : 10.25111/jcd.2020.73.17
Publisher : CDAK Society of Communication Design
Research Area : Arts and Kinesiology > Design > Visual Information Design > Information Design
Received : August 24, 2020
Accepted : October 26, 2020
Published : October 31, 2020

Ryu, Sun Joo ¹

¹순천향대학교

Accredited

ABSTRACT

This study compared and analyzed the effect of design thinking mindset acquisition in offline learning, active online learning, and passive online learning. The research method was to conduct a survey and analyzed the data gathered by answers from 128 university students who received design thinking education by the three different learning methodologies above. To derive a mindset evaluation question for a survey, at first, mindset related data of existing design thinking researchers was investigated to derive 8 mindsets (ambiguity, experimental spirit, empathy ability, integrated thinking, open thinking, cooperation, curiosity, creative confidence). Afterwards, the flat phrases corresponding to each mindset were recombined with design thinking researchers' mindset evaluation questions and psychology's mindset evaluation questions to form 34 questions. The comparison result of the learning effects of 8 mindsets according to the three education methods is as follows. Active online learning showed similar mindset acquisition effect to offline learning. Conversely, passive online learning showed that the learning effect was lower than that of offline learning in the remaining five mindsets excluding experimentation, collaboration, and open mind. Based on the experimental research, it was derived that for the acquisition of design thinking mindsets, active online learning is more effective than passive online learning, and active online learning shows the effect of acquiring design thinking mindsets similar to offline learning. This study confirmed the possibility that active online learning can replace offline learning in order to acquire the design thinking mindset. In addition, it was confirmed that it is necessary to select and develop effective online learning method such as active online learning rather than introducing indiscriminate online learning methods. In the future, it is expected that various studies will be conducted for effective learning methods of design thinking online.

KEYWORDS

Design Thinking, Mindset, Online and Offline Education Comparison

Citation status

* References for papers published after 2023 are currently being built.

[journal] 유선주 / 2019 / A Study on Design Thinking Mindset through Analyzing Characteristics and Traits -Focused on Mindset as an Individual, as a Team Member and as a Problem Solver- / 한국디자인문화학회지 / 한국디자인문화학회 25(3) : 139~152

[book] Brown. T. / 2009 / Change by Design / Harper Business Press

[book] Dweck. C. / 2007 / Mindset: The New Psychology of Success / Penguin Random House LLC.

[book] Simon, H, / 1996 / The Sciences of the Artificial / The MIT Press

[book] Kelly. D.. / 2013 / Creative Confidence / Harper Collins

[book] Kelly. T. / 2005 / 10 Faces of Innovation / Penguin

[book] Martin. R, / 2009 / The Design of Business: Why Design Thinking is the Next Competitive Advantage / Harvard Business Review Press

[book] Martin. R, / 2009 / The Opposable Mind / Harvard Business Review Press

[book] Allen. E. / 2000 / Class Differences:Online Education in the United States, 2010 / Bobson Survey Research Group

[journal] Appana, S. / 2008 / A Review of Benefits and Limitations of Online Learning in the Context of the Student, the Instructor and the Tenured Faculty / International Journal on E-Learning 7

[book] Baeck. A. / 2010 / UX Best Practices –How to Achieve More Impact with User Experience / McGraw-Hill

[journal] Brown. T. / 2008 / Design Thinking / Harvard Business Review 86

[confproc] Dosi. C. / 2018 / Measuring Design Thinking Mindset / Design 2018 - 15th International Design Conference

[journal] Dunne. D. / 2006 / Design thinking and how it will change management education: An interview and discussion / Academy of Management Learning & Education 5

[journal] Harasim. L. / 2000 / Shift happens: online education as a new paradigm in learning / The Internet and Higher Education 3

[confproc] Rauth. I. / 2010 / Design Thinking: An Educational Model towards Creative Confidence / The 1st International Conference on Design Creativity /

[journal] Reza. Saghafi M. / 2014 / A Holistic Model for Blended Learning / Journal of Interactive Learning Research 25

[journal] Rittel. H. / 1973 / Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning / Policy Sciences 4

[journal] Schweitzer, J. / 2016 / The design thinking mindset: An assessment of what we know and what we see in practice / Journal of Design, Business & Society 2

[journal] Wallace. R. / 2010 / Online Learning in Higher Education: a review of research on interactions among teachers and students / Education, Communication and Information 3

[journal] Wrigley C. / 2018 / Design Thinking Education: A Comparison of Massive Open Online Courses / The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation 4

[web] / https://www.stcloudstate.edu/oce/_files/documen ts/coteaching/CollaborationtoolCSAT.pdf / https://www.stcloudstate.edu/oce/_files/documents/coteaching/CollaborationtoolCSAT.pdf

[web] / https://www.coursera.org/ / https://www.coursera.org/

[web] / http://www.innovationfocus.com/articles/crea tive-confidence-and-competence/ / http://www.innovationfocus.com/articles/creative-confidence-and-competence/

[web] / https://www.edx.org/ / https://www.edx.org/

[web] / https://greatergood.berkeley.edu/quizzes/take _quiz/empathy / https://greatergood.berkeley.edu/quizzes/take_quiz/empathy

[web] / https://www.forbes.com/sites/ilkerkoksal/2020/05/02/the-rise-of-online-learning/#7627000672f3 / https://www.forbes.com/sites/ilkerkoksal/2020/05/02/the-rise-of-online-learning/#7627000672f3

[web] / https://education.vermont.gov/documents/profi ciency-based-education-transferable-skills-scoring-criteria-informed-integrative-thinking / https://education.vermont.gov/documents/proficiency-based-education-transferable-skills-scoring-criteria-informed-integrative-thinking

[web] / https://experience.sap.com/skillup/introduction -to-design-thinking/ / https://experience.sap.com/skillup/introduction-to-design-thinking/

[web] / https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Massive_open _online_course / https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Massive_open_online_course

[web] / https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mindset / https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mindset

[web] / https://chiefexecutive.net/ideo-ceo-tim-brown -t-shaped-stars-the-backbone-of-ideoaes-collaborati ve-culture__trashed/ / https://chiefexecutive.net/ideo-ceo-tim-brown-t-shaped-stars-the-backbone-of-ideoaes-collaborative-culture__trashed/

[web] / https://e-student.org/types-of-e-learning/ / https://e-student.org/types-of-e-learning/

[web] / https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zoom / https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zoom

KJCKorea
Journal Central

Journal of Communication Design 2023 KCI Impact Factor : 1.25

A Comparative Study on the Effect of Design Thinking Mindset Acquisition - Focusing on Offline and Online Learning -

ABSTRACT

KEYWORDS

Citation status

* References for papers published after 2023 are currently being built.

Journal of Communication Design 2023 KCI Impact Factor : 1.25

A Comparative Study on the Effect of Design Thinking Mindset Acquisition - Focusing on Offline and Online Learning -

ABSTRACT

KEYWORDS

Statistics

Tools

Issue List

Citation status

KCI Citation Counts (3)

REFERENCES (34) * References for papers published after 2023 are currently being built.

Search PDF

Citation

* References for papers published after 2023 are currently being built.