@article{ART001460265},
author={하숭욱},
title={An interpretation of the image of Kung from a comparative perspective — for Reference to ‘supernumerary’ Eugene⋅Onegin},
journal={Journal of Chinese Language and Literature},
issn={1225-083X},
year={2010},
number={55},
pages={269-285},
doi={10.15792/clsyn..55.201006.269}
TY - JOUR
AU - 하숭욱
TI - An interpretation of the image of Kung from a comparative perspective — for Reference to ‘supernumerary’ Eugene⋅Onegin
JO - Journal of Chinese Language and Literature
PY - 2010
VL - null
IS - 55
PB - Chinese Literary Society Of Yeong Nam
SP - 269
EP - 285
SN - 1225-083X
AB - “Supernumerary” is already recognized by Chinese and foreign literature realm as a title of literary character image, the Supernumerary Series has been developed acme in Russian literature in19th century, the epitomizer is known as Pushkin who was called the “the Sun of Russian Poetry”. His Eugene･Onegin has become a “supernumerary” of the immortal character in world literature. The Chinese literature in 20th century also continued the “supernumerary” mold, especially Lu Xun, he created many of the classic “supernumerary” images, Kung is one of the most typical one. Although in the history of Chinese literature, whether Kung is a “supernumerary” remains in doubts, but if we take a closer look at the numerous studies on image of Kung in contemporary, we will find that Kung has the characteristics that “supernumerary” has. On the base of rational analysis, this paper aims to compare Kung with Onegin from the perspectives of character, the history of the formation, and the practical significance, etc.
KW - Supernumerary Eugene･Onegin Kung; comparison of the characters
DO - 10.15792/clsyn..55.201006.269
ER -
하숭욱. (2010). An interpretation of the image of Kung from a comparative perspective — for Reference to ‘supernumerary’ Eugene⋅Onegin. Journal of Chinese Language and Literature, 55, 269-285.
하숭욱. 2010, "An interpretation of the image of Kung from a comparative perspective — for Reference to ‘supernumerary’ Eugene⋅Onegin", Journal of Chinese Language and Literature, no.55, pp.269-285. Available from: doi:10.15792/clsyn..55.201006.269
하숭욱 "An interpretation of the image of Kung from a comparative perspective — for Reference to ‘supernumerary’ Eugene⋅Onegin" Journal of Chinese Language and Literature 55 pp.269-285 (2010) : 269.
하숭욱. An interpretation of the image of Kung from a comparative perspective — for Reference to ‘supernumerary’ Eugene⋅Onegin. 2010; 55 : 269-285. Available from: doi:10.15792/clsyn..55.201006.269
하숭욱. "An interpretation of the image of Kung from a comparative perspective — for Reference to ‘supernumerary’ Eugene⋅Onegin" Journal of Chinese Language and Literature no.55(2010) : 269-285.doi: 10.15792/clsyn..55.201006.269
하숭욱. An interpretation of the image of Kung from a comparative perspective — for Reference to ‘supernumerary’ Eugene⋅Onegin. Journal of Chinese Language and Literature, 55, 269-285. doi: 10.15792/clsyn..55.201006.269
하숭욱. An interpretation of the image of Kung from a comparative perspective — for Reference to ‘supernumerary’ Eugene⋅Onegin. Journal of Chinese Language and Literature. 2010; 55 269-285. doi: 10.15792/clsyn..55.201006.269
하숭욱. An interpretation of the image of Kung from a comparative perspective — for Reference to ‘supernumerary’ Eugene⋅Onegin. 2010; 55 : 269-285. Available from: doi:10.15792/clsyn..55.201006.269
하숭욱. "An interpretation of the image of Kung from a comparative perspective — for Reference to ‘supernumerary’ Eugene⋅Onegin" Journal of Chinese Language and Literature no.55(2010) : 269-285.doi: 10.15792/clsyn..55.201006.269
