본문 바로가기
  • Home

Exploring Possibility and Responsibility of ‘Heretical’ Ethics in the Age of Hyper-Science: Through a Cross-Reading of Kristeva’s ‘Abjection’ and Bonhoeffer’s ‘Ethics of Formation’

  • The Korean Journal of Chiristian Social Ethics
  • Abbr : 기사윤
  • 2026, (65), pp.95~127
  • Publisher : The Society Of Korean Christian Social Ethics
  • Research Area : Humanities > Christian Theology
  • Received : June 25, 2026
  • Accepted : August 4, 2026
  • Published : August 31, 2026

Baik Soyoung 1

1강남대학교

Accredited

ABSTRACT

This article explores a “hérétique/heretical” ethics for the age of hyper-science by critically engaging scientistic visions of hybrid humanity through Judy Wajcman’s technofeminism. It cross-reads Julia Kristeva’s ethics of connection and rejection with Dietrich Bonhoeffer’s ethics of formation, arguing that Bonhoeffer’s “Christ-reality” complements the communal limitations of Kristeva’s abjection, while Kristeva reveals marginalized realities absent from Bonhoeffer’s patriarchal symbolic order. Together, they offer a framework for responsible, resistant ethical subjectivity and contribute to the development of a feminist theological realism.

Journal Copyright Policy

BY-NC-ND 아이콘

This license enables reusers to copy and distribute the material in any medium or format in unadapted form only, for noncommercial purposes only, and only if attribution is given to the creator.

Citation status

* References for papers published after 2025 are currently being built.