본문 바로가기
  • Home

Participation of the Writer-Intellectual – Focusing on the Case of Post-war French Literary Scholar Kim Bung-gu

  • 탈경계인문학Trans-Humanities
  • 2026, 19(1), pp.32~63
  • DOI : 10.22901/trans.2026.19.1.32
  • Publisher : Ewha Institute for the Humanities: EIH
  • Research Area : Humanities > Other Humanities
  • Received : March 30, 2026
  • Accepted : April 21, 2026
  • Published : April 30, 2026

Hong Rae-seong 1

1서울시립대학교

Accredited

ABSTRACT

This paper aims to clarify the nature of engagement as conceived by Kim Bung-gu. In his paper The Writer and Society, Kim Bung-gu rejected Sartre and instead emphasized the relationship between the creative self and the social self, Camus's spontaneous engagement, and the respective cases of Malraux–Saint-Exupéry and Gide–Camus. These positions provoked fierce opposition at the time. Kim Bung-gu's argument derived from two lines of discourse he had consistently maintained: ① a witness literature discourse holding that writers must bear truthful testimony grounded in lived experience, with Gide, Malraux, and Camus as exemplary figures; and ② an intellectual discourse criticizing petit intellectuals who followed Sartrean engagement, and arguing that Korean intellectuals should instead pursue a cooperative form of participation—sharing in joys and sorrows and dividing labor—what Kim termed participation. In sum, The Writer and Society expressed Kim Bung-gu's long-held conviction that genuine engagement is achieved only when a writer's testimony and an intellectual's participation attain an appropriate tension and harmony.

Citation status

* References for papers published after 2024 are currently being built.