본문 바로가기
  • Home

The compilation system and character of 『Joseonsa(朝鮮史)』 compiled by Joseonsa pyeonsuhoe(朝鮮史編修會) - with special emphasis on the first book of Vol. 1-

  • The Review of Korean History
  • 2010, (99), pp.147-183
  • Publisher : The Historical Society Of Korea
  • Research Area : Humanities > History

Chanheung Park 1

1고려대학교

Accredited

ABSTRACT

On this paper, I concretely analyzed the compilation system of 『Joseonsa(朝鮮史)』 by Joseonsa pyeonsuhoe(朝鮮史編修會) and of the first book of Vol. 1. Compared the compilation system og 『Joseonsa(朝鮮史)』 with that of Japanese modern source book, and Compared the contents of the first book of Vol. 1 with those of 『Samguksagi(三國史記)』 and 『Samgungnyusa(三國遺事)』. We can say that well arranged 『Samguksagi(三國史記)』 and 『Samgungnyusa (三國遺事)』, an epigraph and so forth, and compiled in a chronological order. Joseonsa pyeonsuhoe systematically arranged almost every historical records could know a year, and one by one checked original text of each record. But there are some misprints and omitted words, and fairly many records sure that it is before than the year 668 are omitted. It is widely different with assertion of Joseonsa pyeonsuhoe that it is very correct chronological form's history book. Especially, record of a chronological table in 『Samguksagi(三國史記)』 ‘The history of Haedong(海東) is succeed to Gija(箕子) and Wiman(衛滿)' was excluded, and put the clause of 「Gojoseon(古朝鮮)」 in 『Samgungnyusa(三國遺事)』 in the coronation year clause of Dongmyeongseongwang(東明聖王) in Goguryeo(高句麗). It was because of the purpose that they did not admit Dangun sinhwa(檀君神話) and Gojoseon(古朝鮮). The title of 『Joseonsa(朝鮮史)』 is the title of history book published in the form of description, not perfect in the source book. There were worry and the limit of historian could not describe Korean history book corresponded with Colonial control of Japanese imperialism.

Citation status

* References for papers published after 2022 are currently being built.