본문 바로가기
  • Home

A Comparative Study on the Logic Structure of Myeongri Old Law and New Law

  • Industry Promotion Research
  • Abbr : IPR
  • 2020, 5(3), pp.61-71
  • DOI : 10.21186/IPR.2020.5.3.061
  • Publisher : Industrial Promotion Institute
  • Research Area : Interdisciplinary Studies > Interdisciplinary Research
  • Received : June 16, 2020
  • Accepted : July 15, 2020
  • Published : July 31, 2020

Na Hyeok-Jin 1 Kyung Hwa Jung 1

1국제뇌교육종합대학원 동양학과

Candidate

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this paper is to reaffirm the logical framework of the saju analysis method by recreating the saju model of old-law to study and organize the theories of frame in old-law Myeongri, and then by organizing and comparing the logic structure of the saju analysis method of new-law and old-law. Some believe that Myeongri Theory first appeared in the world in the Warring States Period when they were active with Gwigokja and Naknokja as origin, while others believe that it was origin that "Okjokyeong" was written by Kwak-Bak of Eastern Jin after a while. Since then, Myeongri Theory, which had been organized by Won-Cheongang and Yi-Heojung, has undergone a major transformation since reaching the Song Dynasty Seo-Japyeong. Based on this point, the Myeongri Theory of the previous generation is called the Old-law, and the subsequent theory is called the New-law. The changes in the logic structure of the old-law and the new-law leave a big difference and disconnect between those. But comparative studies have confirmed that the philosophy and logic structure due to natural laws that have not changed much such as the symbolic system of nature called Yinyang & five elements and Cheongan-jiji, the idea of a heavenly response projected in the Three Wonders of heaven, earth and human, and the concept of generation and time in the position of year-month-day-time.

Citation status

* References for papers published after 2023 are currently being built.