[book]
Arai-Takahashi, Yutaka.
/ 2001
/ The Margin of Appreciation Doctrine and the Principle of Proportionality in the Jurisprudence of the ECHR
/ Intersentia
[journal]
Bakircioglu, Onder
/ 2007
/ The Application of the Margin of Appreciation Doctrine in Freedom of Expression and Public Morality Cases
/ German Law Journal
8(7)
: 711~733
[book]
Beitz, Charles R.
/ 2009
/ The Idea of Human Rights
/ Oxford University Press
[journal]
Benvenisti, Eyal
/ 1999
/ Margin of Appreciation, Consensus, and Universal Standards
/ International Law and Politics
31
: 843~854
[book]
Berry, Stephanie.
/ 2013
/ Freedom of Religion and Religious Symbols: Same Right – Different Interpretation?
/ Talk!
[book]
Bjorge, Eirik.
/ 2015
/ Domestic Application of the ECHR : Courts as Faithful Trustees
/ Oxford University Press
[journal]
Brauch, Jeffrey A
/ 2005
/ The Margin of Appreciation and the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights : Threat to the Rule of Law
/ Columbia Journal of European Law
11(1)
: 113~150
[other]
Butti, Elena
/ 2012
/ The Strategic Use of the Margin of Appreciation Doctrine in the European Court of Human Rights
/ Jurist
[book]
Çalı, Başak.
/ 2013
/ The Legitimacy of International Human Rights Regimes: Legal, Political and Philosophical Perspectives
/ Cambridge University Press
[journal]
Carozza, Paolo G
/ 2003
/ Subsidiarity as a Structural Principle of International Human Rights Law
/ American Journal of International Law
97
: 38~79
[book]
Donnelly, Jack.
/ 2013
/ Universal Human Rights in Theory and Practice
/ Cornell University Press
[journal]
Feingold, Cora S
/ 1977
/ The Doctrine of Margin of Appreciation and the European Convention on Human Rights
/ Notre Dame Lawyer
53
: 90~106
[journal]
Føllesdal, Andreas
/ 2017
/ Exporting the Margin of Appreciation : Lessons for the Inter-American Court of Human Rights
/ International Journal of Constitutional Law
15(2)
: 359~371
[book]
Fredman, Sandra.
/ 2001
/ Discrimination and Human Rights
/ Oxford University Press
[book]
Freeman, Michael.
/ 2011
/ Human Rights : An Interdisciplinary Approach
/ Polity Press
[book]
Harris, David
/ 2018
/ Law of the European Convention on Human Rights
/ Oxford University Press
[journal]
Henkin, Louis
/ 1996
/ Human Rights and State “Sovereignty”
/ Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law
25
: 31~45
[journal]
Hwang, Shu-Perng
/ 2020
/ Margin of Appreciation in Pursuit of Pluralism? Critical Remarks on the Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights on the ‘Burqa Bans’
/ Human Rights Law Review
20
: 361~380
[journal]
Kratochvil, Jan
/ 2011
/ The Inflation of the Margin of Appreciation by the European Court of Human Rights
/ Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights
29(3)
: 324~357
[book]
Legg, Andrew.
/ 2012
/ The Margin of Appreciation in International Human Rights Law : Deference and Proportionality
/ Oxford University Press
[journal]
Letsas, George
/ 2006
/ Two Concepts of the Margin of Appreciation
/ Oxford Journal of Legal Studies
26(4)
: 705~732
[book]
Letsas, George.
/ 2007
/ A Theory of Interpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights
/ Oxford University Press
[book]
MacDonald, Ronald. St. J.
/ 1993
/ The European System for the Protection of Human Rights
/ Martinus Nijhoff
[journal]
McGoldrick, Domonic
/ 2016
/ A Defense of the Margin of Appreciation and an Argument for its Application by the Human Rights Committee
/ International and Comparative Law Quarterly
65(1)
: 21~60
[journal]
Nowlin, Christopher J
/ 2002
/ The Protection of Morals Under the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms
/ Human Rights Quarterly
24(1)
: 264~286
[journal]
Palombella, Gianluigi
/ 2021
/ Non-arbitrariness, Rule of Law and the ‘Margin of Appreciation’ : Comments on Andreas Follesdal
/ Global Constitutionalism
10(1)
: 139~150
[journal]
Peters, Anne
/ 2009
/ Humanity as the A and Ω of Sovereignty
/ European Journal of International Law
20(3)
: 513~544
[journal]
Shany, Yuval
/ 2005
/ Toward a General Margin of Appreciation Doctrine in International Law?
/ European Journal of International Law
16(5)
: 907~940
[book]
Talbott, William J.
/ 2007
/ Which Rights Should Be Universal?
/ Oxford University Press
[journal]
Villa, Marisa I
/ 2017
/ Subsidiarity, Margin of Appreciation and International Adjudication within a Cooperative Conception of Human Rights
/ International Journal of Constitutional Law
15(2)
: 393~413
[journal]
Vogiatzis, Nikos
/ 2019
/ The Relationship Between European Consensus, the Margin of Appreciation and the Legitimacy of the Strasbourg Court
/ European Public Law
25(3)
: 445~480
[book]
Yourow, Howard C.
/ 1996
/ The Margin of Appreciation Doctrine in the Dynamics of European Human Rights Jurisprudence
/ Martinus Nijhoff
[journal]
Yusuf, Hakeem
/ 2014
/ S. A. S. v France : Supporting Living Together of Forced Assimilation
/ International Human Rights Law Review
3
: 277~302
[journal]
Zucca, Lorenzo
/ 2013
/ Lautsi : A Commentary on a Decision by the ECtHR Grand Chamber
/ International Journal of Constitutional Law
11(1)
: 218~229
[other]
/ 1976
/ Handyside v. the United Kingdom, Application no. 5493/72 (7 December 1976)
[other]
/ 1978
/ Ireland v. the United Kingdom, Application no. 5310/71 (18 January 1978)
[other]
/ 1978
/ Tyrer v. the United Kingdom, Application no. 5856/72 (25 April 1978)
[other]
/ 1978
/ Klass v. Germany, Application no. 5029/71 (6 September 1978)
[other]
/ 1981
/ Dudgeon v. the United Kingdom, Application no. 7525/76 (22 October 1981)
[other]
/ 1986
/ Rees v. the United Kingdom, Application no. 9532/81 (17 October 1986)
[other]
/ 1988
/ Müller and Others v. Switzerland, Application no. 10737/84 (24 May 1988)
[other]
/ 1988
/ Norris v. Ireland, Application No. 10581/83 (26 October 1988)
[other]
/ 1990
/ Cossey v. the United Kingdom, Application no. 10843/84 (29 August 1990)
[other]
/ 1993
/ Brannigan and McBride v. the United Kingdom, Application nos. 14553/89, 14554/89 (25 May 1993)
[other]
/ 1994
/ Otto-Preminger-Institut v. Austria, Application no. 13470/87 (20 September 1994)
[other]
/ 1996
/ Wingrove v. the United Kingdom, Application no. 17419/90 (25 November 1996)
[other]
/ 1997
/ Z v. Finland, Application no. 22009/93 (25 February 1997)
[other]
/ 1997
/ X, Y and Z v. the United Kingdom, Application no. 21830/93 (22 April 1997)
[other]
/ 1998
/ Sheffield v. the United Kingdom, Application no. 22985/93 (30 July 1998)
[other]
/ 1999
/ Immobiliare Saffi v. Italy, Application no. 22774/93 (28 July 1999)
[other]
/ 2001
/ Dahlab v. Switzerland, Application no. 42393/98 (15 February 2001)
[other]
/ 2001
/ Mata Estevez v. Spain, Application no. 56501/00 (10 May 2001)
[other]
/ 2002
/ Fretté v. France, Application no. 36515/97 (26 February 2002)
[other]
/ 2002
/ I. v. the United Kingdom, Application no. 25680/94 (11 July 2002)
[other]
/ 2002
/ Christine Goodwin v. the United Kingdom, Application no. 28957/95 (11 July 2002)
[other]
/ 2003
/ Murphy v. Ireland, Application no. 44179/98 (10 July 2003)
[other]
/ 2005
/ Stec and Others v. the United Kingdom, Application nos. 65731/01, 65900/01 (6 July 2005)
[other]
/ 2005
/ Leyla Şahin v. Turkey, Application no. 44774/98 (10 November 2005)
[other]
/ 2008
/ Dogru v. France, Application no. 27058/05 (4 December 2008)
[other]
/ 2008
/ Kervanci v. France, Application no. 31645/04 (4 December 2008)
[other]
/ 2009
/ A. and Others v. the United Kingdom, Application no. 3455/05 (19 February 2009)
[other]
/ 2009
/ Aktas v. France, Application no. 43563/08 (30 June 2009)
[other]
/ 2009
/ Bayrak v. France, Application no. 14308/08 (30 June 2009)
[other]
/ 2009
/ Gamaleddyn v. France, Application no. 18527/08 (30 June 2009)
[other]
/ 2009
/ Ghazal v. France, Application no. 29134/08 (30 June 2009)
[other]
/ 2009
/ J. Singh v. France, Application no. 25463/08 (30 June 2009)
[other]
/ 2009
/ R. Singh v. France, Application no. 27561/08 (30 June 2009)
[other]
/ 2009
/ Lautsi v. Italy, Application no. 30814/06 (3 November 2009)
[other]
/ 2010
/ Schalk and Kopf v. Austria, Application no. 30141/04 (24 June 2010)
[other]
/ 2010
/ A, B and C v. Ireland, Application no. 25579/05 (16 December 2010)
[other]
/ 2011
/ Lautsi and Others v. Italy, Application no. 30814/06 (18 March 2011)
[other]
/ 2011
/ Bayatyan v. Armenia, Application no. 23459/03 (7 July 2011)
[other]
/ 2013
/ Eweida and Others v. the United Kingdom, Application nos. 48420/10, 36516/10, 51671/10 et al. (15 January 2013)
[other]
/ 2013
/ Animal Defenders International v. the United Kingdom, Application No. 48876/08 (22 April 2013)
[other]
/ 2014
/ S.A.S. v. France, Application no. 43835/11 (1 July 2014)
[other]
/ 2015
/ Oliari and Others v. Italy, Application nos. 18766/11, 36030/11 (21 July 2015)
[other]
/ 2017
/ Bayev v. Russia, Application nos. 67667/09, 44092/12, 56717/12 (20 June 2017)
[other]
/ 2017
/ Dakir v. Belgium, Application no. 4619/12 (11 July 2017)
[other]
/ 2017
/ Belkacemi and Oussar v. Belgium, Application no. 37798/13 (11 July 2017)
[other]
/ 2023
/ Fedotova and Others v. Russia, Applications nos. 40792/10, 30538/14, 43439/14 (17 January 2023)
[other]
Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe
/ 2018
/ Copenhagen Declaration
[other]
Human Rights Committee
/ 1993
/ General Comment 22. U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add.4
[report]
/ 2020
/ Report of the Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Religion or Belief: Gender-Based Violence and Discrimination in the Name of Religion or Belief
/ U.N