본문 바로가기
  • Home

Mutual-accountability of Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives (MSIs) Partnership: A Comparative Evaluation

  • Journal of Regional Studies and Development
  • Abbr : JRSD
  • 2017, 26(2), pp.1-32
  • Publisher : Institute for Poverty Alleviation and International Development: IPAID
  • Research Area : Social Science > Area Studies > Regional Studies in general > Comparative / Statistical Regional Studies
  • Published : August 30, 2017

김민지 1 Park Bokyeong ORD ID 2

1한국보건사회연구원 글로벌사회정책연구센터
2경희대학교

Accredited

ABSTRACT

This study evaluates the mutual-accountability of MSIs, particularly focusing on the dimension of participation among internal stakeholders, and compares across three different types of MSIs: representative, deliberative, and functional. We set up an evaluation framework applying the GAP and Brinkerhoff’s framework on accountability of partnership, and define quantifiable scoring rules for an objective evaluation. The study evaluates 19 MSIs in different types. The result shows that representative MSIs secure the best mutual-accountability, while functional MSIs are the weakest and deliberate MSIs in between. As well, it suggests that MSIs formed around an inter-governmental organization are prone to construct a shadow hierarchy among partners regardless of their formal constitution.

Citation status

* References for papers published after 2023 are currently being built.

This paper was written with support from the National Research Foundation of Korea.