Journal of Regional Studies and Development 2023 KCI Impact Factor : 0.4
-
pISSN : 1738-3846 / eISSN : 2765-4028
- https://journal.kci.go.kr/jrsd_ipaid
KJCKorea
Journal Central
Mutual-accountability of Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives (MSIs) Partnership: A Comparative Evaluation
- Journal of Regional Studies and Development
- Abbr : JRSD
- 2017, 26(2), pp.1-32
- Publisher : Institute for Poverty Alleviation and International Development: IPAID
- Research Area : Social Science > Area Studies > Regional Studies in general > Comparative / Statistical Regional Studies
- Published : August 30, 2017
김민지
1,
Park Bokyeong
2
1한국보건사회연구원 글로벌사회정책연구센터
2경희대학교
Accredited
ABSTRACT
This study evaluates the mutual-accountability of MSIs, particularly focusing on the dimension of participation among internal stakeholders, and compares across three different types of MSIs: representative, deliberative, and functional. We set up an evaluation framework applying the GAP and Brinkerhoff’s framework on accountability of partnership, and define quantifiable scoring rules for an objective evaluation. The study evaluates 19 MSIs in different types. The result shows that representative MSIs secure the best mutual-accountability, while functional MSIs are the weakest and deliberate MSIs in between. As well, it suggests that MSIs formed around an inter-governmental organization are prone to construct a shadow hierarchy among partners regardless of their formal constitution.
Statistics
-
186 Viewed
-
44 Downloaded
Tools
Issue List
Citation status
* References for papers published after 2023 are currently being built.
[journal]
Acar, M
/ 2004
/ Accountability Challenges in Partnerships and Networks: Evidence from Educational Partnerships in the United States
/ International Review of Administrative Sciences
70
: 359~374
[journal]
Agranoff, R
/ 2001
/ Big Questions in Public Network Management research
/ Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory
11
: 295~326
[journal]
Bardach, E
/ 1996
/ Accountability in Human Services Collaboratives: For What and to Whom
/ Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory
6
: 197~224
[journal]
Bäckstrand, Karin
/ 2006
/ Multi-stakeholder Partnerships for Sustainable Development: Rethinking Legitimacy, Accountability and Effectiveness
/ European Environment
16(5)
: 290~306
[book]
Beisheim, M
/ 2014
/ Transnational Partnerships: Effectively Providing for Sustainable Development
/ Springer
[book]
Blagescu, M
/ 2009
/ Accountability of Transnational Actors: Is There Scope for Cross-sector Principles? Non-state Actors as Standard Setters
/ Cambridge University Press
[book]
Blagscu, M
/ 2005
/ Partnerships and Accountability: Current Thinking and Approaches among Agencies Supporting Civil Society Organizations
/ Overseas development Institute (ODI)
[journal]
Brinkerhoff, J. M
/ 2002
/ Assessing and Improving Partnership Relationships and Outcomes: a Proposed Framework
/ Evaluation and program planning
25(3)
: 215~231
[journal]
Brinkerhoff, J. M
/ 2004
/ Partnerships between International Donors and Non-governmental Development Organizations: Opportunities and Constraints
/ International Review of Administrative Sciences
70(2)
: 253~270
[book]
Chan, S
/ 2014
/ A Global Framework for Climate Action-Orchestrating Non-state and Subnational Initiatives for More Effective Global Climate Governance
/ Deutsches Institut fur Entwickslungpolitik
[book]
Danish Institute for International Studies [DIIS]
/ 2016
/ The Promises and Pitfalls of Global Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives
/ DIIS Publications
[journal]
Detomasi, D
/ 2007
/ The Multinational Corporation and Global Governance:Modelling Global Public Policy Networks
/ Journal of Business Ethics
71
: 321~334
[report]
Dodds, F
/ 2002
/ Post Johannesburg: The Future of the UN Commission on Sustainable Development
/ WHAT Governance Programme
[journal]
Faysse, N
/ 2006
/ Troubles on the Way: An Analysis of Challenges Faced by Multi-stakeholder Platforms
/ Natural Resources Forum
30(3)
: 219~229
[journal]
Fransen, L. W
/ 2007
/ Global Rule-setting for Business: A Critical Analysis of Multi-stakeholder Standards
/ Organization
14(5)
: 667~684
[book]
Gavi Alliance
/ 2013
/ Gavi Alliance By-laws
/ Gavi Alliance
[journal]
Gilbert, D. U
/ 2011
/ Accountability in a Global Economy: The Emergence of International Accountability Standards
/ Business Ethics Quarterly
21(1)
: 23~44
[web]
Global Partnership for Education[GPE]
/ 2017
/ About Us
/ http://www.globalpartnership.org/about-us
[web]
Global Reporting Initiatives[GRI]
/ 2015
/ Rules and Procedures for the GRI Board of Directors
/ https://www.globalreporting.org/SiteCollectionDocuments/2016/Governance%20documents/Rules%20and%20Procedures%20for%20the%20GRI%20Board%20of%20Directors.pdf
[book]
Gulbrandsen, L. H
/ 2010
/ Transnational Environmental Governance: the Emergence and Effects of the Certification of Forest and Fisheries
/ Edward Elgar Publishing
[book]
Hammer, M
/ 2011
/ Pathways to Accountability II: The 2011 Revised Global Accountability Framework: Report on the Stakeholder Consultation and the New Indicator Framework
/ One World Trust
[book]
Haufler, V
/ 2003
/ Social and Political Dimensions of Forest Certification
/ Remagen-Oberwinter
: 237~247
[book]
Hemmati, M
/ 2002
/ Multi-stakeholder processes for governance and sustainability: beyond deadlock and conflict
/ Routledge
[book]
Ivanova, M. H
/ 2003
/ Progress or peril
/
: 9~36
[journal]
Keohane, R. O
/ 2005
/ Abuse of Power
/ Harvard International Review
27(2)
: 48~
[book]
Kirton, J. J
/ 2004
/ Hard Choices, Soft Law: Voluntary Standards in Global Trade, Environment and Social Governance
/ Ashgate
: 3~29
[book]
Koechlin, Lucy
/ 2009
/ Non-state Actors as Standard Setters
/ Cambridge University Press
: 84~112
[journal]
Levy, D. L
/ 2010
/ The Contested Politics of Corporate Governance: The Case of the Global Reporting Initiative
/ Business & Society
49(1)
: 88~115
[book]
Maiyegun, O. I
/ 2007
/ Participation in the Deliberative Process of the United Nations: The Influence of Nongovernmental Organizations (NGOs)on Decision Outcomes
/ ProQuest
[book]
Martens, J
/ 2007
/ Multistakeholder Partnerships- Future Models of Multilateralism? (Vol. 29)
/ Friedrich-Elbert-Stiftung
[journal]
Mena, S
/ 2012
/ Input and Output Legitimacy of Multi-stakeholder Initiatives
/ Business Ethics Quarterly
22(3)
: 527~556
[web]
Miller-Dawkins, May
/ 2016
/ How Can You Tell whether a Multi-Stakeholder Initiative is a Total Waste of Time?; From Poverty to Power
/ Oxfamblogs.org
/ https://oxfamblogs.org/fp2p/how-can-you-tell-whether-a-multi-stakeholder-initiative-is-a-total-waste-of-time/
[journal]
Milward, H. B
/ 1996
/ Symposium on the Hollow State: Capacity, Control and Performance in Inter-organizational Settings
/ Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory
6
: 193~195
[journal]
Moog, S
/ 2015
/ The Politics of Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives: The Crisis of the Forest Stewardship Council
/ Journal of Business Ethics
128(3)
: 469~493
[journal]
O’Rourke, D
/ 2006
/ Multi-stakeholder Regulation: Privatizing or Socializing Global Labor Standards
/ World Development
34(5)
: 899~918
[journal]
O’Toole, L. J., Jr
/ 1997
/ The Implications for Democracy in a Networked Bureaucratic World
/ Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory
7
: 443~459
[journal]
Radin, B. A
/ 1996
/ Accountability Expectations in an Intergovernmental Arena: The National Rural Development Partnership
/ Publius: Journal of Federalism
26(2)
: 59~81
[journal]
Rasche, A
/ 2009
/ Toward a Model to Compare and Analyze Accountability Standards: The Case of the UN Global Compact
/ Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
16
: 192~205
[journal]
Rasche, A
/ 2012
/ Global Policies and Local Practices: Loose and Tight Coupling in Multi-stakeholder Initiatives
/ Business Ethics Quarterly
22(4)
: 679~780
[book]
Rasche, A
/ 2010
/ The UN Global Compact: Achievements, Trends and Challenges
/ Cambridge University Press
[journal]
Roloff, J
/ 2008
/ Learning from Multi-stakeholder Networks: Issue Focused Stakeholder Management
/ Journal of Business Ethics
82(1)
: 233~250
[journal]
Schouten, G
/ 2012
/ On the Deliberative Capacity of Private Multi-stakeholder Governance: the Roundtables on Responsible Soy and Sustainable Palm Oil
/ Ecological Economics
83
: 42~50
[book]
Tamm Hallström, K
/ 2010
/ Transnational multi-stakeholder standardization: Organizing fragile non-state authority
/ Edward Elgar
[web]
United Nations [UN]
/ 2016
/ Global Partnerships - United Nations Sustainable Development
/
/ http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/globalpartnerships
[journal]
Warner, J. F
/ 2006
/ Multi-stakeholder Participation? Multi-stakeholder Platforms for Integrated Catchment Management
/ International Journal of Water Resources Development
22(1)
: 15~35
[journal]
Whitaker, Gordon P
/ 2004
/ Mutual Accountability between Governments and Nonprofits. Moving beyond “Surveillance” to “Service.”
/ American Review of Public Administration
34
: 115~133
This paper was written with support from the National Research Foundation of Korea.