본문 바로가기
  • Home

A study on major components of response-to-intervention in mathematics

  • Journal of Special Education: Theory and Practice
  • Abbr : JSPED
  • 2008, 9(1), pp.279~302
  • Publisher : Research Institute of the Korea Special Education
  • Research Area : Social Science > Education

김용욱 1 Jeonghan Woo 2 이성환 1 안정애 3

1대구대학교
2대구사이버대학교
3달성초등학교

Accredited

ABSTRACT

In this study, 6 experimental studies, which applied the response-to-intervention (RTI) to the at-risk children on mathematics, were analyzed to draw a solution on the main problematic issues before introduction and application in Korea. 6 studies which have been reported from 1982 to 2007, were reviewed on issues such as: 1) appropriate time and target population for effective applying RTI; 2) numbers and types of tier 3) measurement ways to nonresponse 4) effectiveness on identifying of learning difficulties. The major conclusions are summarized as follows: First, the response-to-intervention model was mainly applied to the 1st and 2nd grade students with class-wide or school-wide. Second, 2 or 3 tiers were mainly adopted and the 1st tier were used for selecting at-risk children, then the 2nd and 3rd tier were each used for increasing intensive teaching. Third, the CBM was mainly used as a measurement tool, and low-ranking 16% criteria was applied in selecting at-risk children, but criteria in nonresponse were various. Forth, it is suggested that response-to-intervention model could be a strict standard which might decrease a prevalence in identifying learning disabilities.Based on these results, there are, though, some implications in measurement and procedural issues in applying response-to-intervention to mathematics field for students with learning difficulties, however, it seems to be still needed theoretical and experimental verifications to find out perfect agreement on these issues.

Journal Copyright Policy

No CCL information provided

Citation status

* References for papers published after 2025 are currently being built.