Automated Reviewers Recommendation on Online Submission System in Journal Publishing (국내외 학술지 투고관리시스템의 심사위원 추천 기능 분석)

Shin, Eun-Ja (신은자)

doi:10.14699/kbiblia.2022.33.4.139

Automated Reviewers Recommendation on Online Submission System in Journal Publishing

Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science
2022, 33(4), pp.139-157
DOI : 10.14699/kbiblia.2022.33.4.139
Publisher : Journal Of The Korean Biblia Society For Library And Information Science
Research Area : Interdisciplinary Studies > Library and Information Science
Received : November 15, 2022
Accepted : November 27, 2022
Published : December 30, 2022

Shin, Eun-Ja ¹

¹세종대학교

Accredited

ABSTRACT

Finding and selecting proper reviewers is a burden on the publisher of the journal. In order to solve this problem, the online submission system started to recommend appropriate reviewers automatically. It includes a variety of new features, from recommending authors in the references of submitted papers as reviewers to finding similar papers by searching the citation index and suggesting reviewer candidates extensively. This study investigated how the online submission system provides functions such as recommendation of reviewers. As a result of examining major online submission systems, ScholarOne and Editorial Manager were recommending reviewer candidates by commercial citation index and review history platform. On the other hand, JAMS, a domestic online submission system, did not have any advanced functions such as recommendation of candidates for reviewers. Sooner or later, in Korea, it seems that more efforts should be made to improve the function of online submission system, such as recommending suitable reviewers for papers.

KEYWORDS

Journal, Online Submission System, Peer Review, Reviewer, Automatic Recommendation, Reviewer Locator, JAMS

Citation status

* References for papers published after 2023 are currently being built.

[journal] 강창완 / 2020 / Automatic Recommender Algorithm of Reviewers Using Machine Learning / Journal of The Korean Data Analysis Society / 한국자료분석학회 22(6) : 2405~2412

[journal] 김지영 / 2020 / A Study on Open Peer Review Perception of Korean Authors in a Mega OA Journal / 정보관리학회지 / 한국정보관리학회 37(4) : 131~150

[web] 클래리베이트코리아 / 2019 / ScholarOne 스콜라원 Publons 퍼블론스 / https://youtu.be/83-feWjnxkc

[web] 한국연구재단 / 2022 / 온라인 논문투고 심사시스템 매뉴얼: JAMS 2.0 / https://portal.jams.or.kr/

[report] 황석원 / 2020 / 데이터 기반 연구개발 관리 혁신 방안 / 과학기술정책연구원

[web] Aries Systems Corporation / 2021 / Aries Systems and Clarivate Partner to Connect Web of Science Reviewer Locator with Editorial Manager / https://www.ariessys.com/news-and-events/press-releases/aries-systems-and-clarivatepartner-to-connect-web-of-science-reviewer-locator-with-editorial-manager/

[book] Balster, R. L. / 2017 / Publishing Addiction Science:A Guide for the Perplexed / Ubiquity Press : 245~263

[journal] Baveye, P. C. / 2021 / Objectivity of the peer-review process : enduring myth, reality, and possible remedies / Learned Publishing 34(4) : 696~700

[journal] Cann, D. P. / 2018 / The power of suggestion: should authors nominate peer reviewers? / Journal of Materials Science 53(7) : 4705~4708

[journal] da Silva, J. A. T. / 2021 / ow do clarivate analytics and publons propose to fortify peer review in the COVID-19 era? / Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences 16(2) : 139~143

[journal] Gaston, T. / 2018 / What influences the regional diversity of reviewers : a study of medical and agricultural/biological sciences journals / Learned Publishing 31(3) : 189~197

[journal] Haffar, S. / 2019 / Peer review bias: a critical review / Mayo Clinic Proceedings 94(4) : 670~676

[journal] Haider, S. M. / 2019 / Open journal system / Annals of Abbasi Shaheed Hospital and Karachi Medical & Dental College 24(2) : 59~61

[journal] S. P. J. M. Horbach / 2018 / The changing forms and expectations of peer review / Research Integrity and Peer Review / Springer Science and Business Media LLC 3(1) : 1~15

[book] Johnson, R. / 2018 / The STM Report: An Overview of Scientific and Scholarly Publishing / International Association of Scientific, Technical and Medical Publishers

[journal] Jorm, A. F. / 2022 / Publons as a source of high volume, poorly targeted reviewer requests : the need for better standards of practice by publishers / Learned Publishing 35(2) : 285~287

[journal] 김순 / 2018 / Comparative analysis of manuscript management systems for scholarly publishing / Science Editing / 한국과학학술지편집인협의회 5(2) : 124~134

[journal] Kovanis, M. / 2016 / The global burden of journal peer review in the biomedical literature : strong imbalance in the collective enterprise / PloS one 11(11) : e0166387~

[journal] Liang, Y. / 2018 / Should authors suggest reviewers? a comparative study of the performance of author-suggested and editor-selected reviewers at a biological journal / Learned Publishing 31(3) : 216~221

[journal] Andreas F. Mavrogenis / 2020 / The good, the bad and the rude peer-review / International Orthopaedics / Springer Science and Business Media LLC 44(3) : 413~415

[journal] McGlinchey, N. / 2019 / Do journal administrators solve the reviewer assignment problem as well as editors? consideration of reviewer rigour and timeliness / Learned Publishing 32(1) : 37~46

[journal] Evelyn Merrill / 2014 / Reviewer overload and what can we do about it / The Journal of Wildlife Management / Wiley 78(6) : 961~962

[journal] Ortega, J. L. / 2018 / Exploratory analysis of publons metrics and their relationship with bibliometric and altmetric impact / Aslib Journal of Information Management 71(1) : 124~136

[web] PRC / 2016 / PRC Peer Review Survey 2015 / https://www.elsevier.com/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/655756/PRC-peer-review-survey-report-Final-2016-05-19.pdf

[web] Publons and Clarivate Analytics / 2019 / Publons / https://clarivate.co.kr/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Publons-Korean-2019-onsolidated-Factsheet.pdf

[other] Rogers, A. / 2020 / What can we do to improve peer review in NLP? / arXivpreprint arXiv:2010.03863

[web] Sage / 2014 / SAGE Publications Busts “peer review and citation ring,” 60 papers retracted / https://retractionwatch.com/2014/07/08/sage-publications-busts-peer-review-and-citation-ring-60-papers-retracted/

[journal] Severin, A. / 2021 / Purposes of peer review : a qualitative study of stakeholder expectations and perceptions / Learned Publishing 34(2) : 144~155

[journal] Shah, N. B. / 2022 / Challenges, experiments, and computational solutions in peer review / Communications of the ACM 65(6) : 76~87

[web] Springer / 2015 / 64 More Papers Retracted for Fake Reviews, This Time from Springer Journals / https://retractionwatch.com/2015/08/17/64-more-papers-retracted-for-fake-reviews-this-time-from-springer-journals/

[web] Springer Nature / 2022 / Reviewer Finder / https://www.springernature.com/gp/editors/resources-tools/reviewer-finder

[web] Taylor & Francis Editor Resources / 2022 / How to Find Peer Reviewers: an Editor's Guide / https://editorresources.taylorandfrancis.com/managing-peer-review-process/how-to-find-peer-reviewers-an-editors-guide/

KJCKorea
Journal Central

Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science 2023 KCI Impact Factor : 0.82

Automated Reviewers Recommendation on Online Submission System in Journal Publishing

ABSTRACT

KEYWORDS

Citation status

* References for papers published after 2023 are currently being built.

Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science 2023 KCI Impact Factor : 0.82

Automated Reviewers Recommendation on Online Submission System in Journal Publishing

ABSTRACT

KEYWORDS

Statistics

Tools

Issue List

Citation status

KCI Citation Counts (0)

REFERENCES (32) * References for papers published after 2023 are currently being built.

Search PDF

Citation

* References for papers published after 2023 are currently being built.