Legal Review and Challenges for Acquisition for the Purpose of Investigation of Data Stored Abroad (수사를 목적으로 한 국외에 저장된 데이터의 취득에 대한 법적 검토)

Joon Mo Kang (강준모)

Legal Review and Challenges for Acquisition for the Purpose of Investigation of Data Stored Abroad

Legal Theory & Practice Review
Abbr : LTPR
2022, 10(4), pp.461-498
Publisher : The Korea Society for Legal Theory and Practice Inc.
Research Area : Social Science > Law
Received : October 14, 2022
Accepted : November 21, 2022
Published : November 30, 2022

Joon Mo Kang ¹

¹호서대학교

Accredited

ABSTRACT

This study examines the legal system tasks for computer data acquisition performed by criminal investigation agencies. Computer data related to the suspect is currently one of the main investigation targets. The types of target data are also diverse. Even if it is directly related to the suspect, there are e-mail records, the suspect’s communication or online service use records, and electronic files stored in the suspect’s computer or cloud. In addition, currently, a large amount of information collected without the suspect’s awareness, such as location information of mobile phone terminals or vehicles, CCTV (surveillance cameras, etc.) or black box records, and information collected by IoT (Internet of Things) technology, is also accumulated. is being preserved Such information can also be the subject of criminal investigations. Obtaining such information may be problematic from the point of view of the suspect's privacy or personal information protection. In addition, most of the information on the network is stored abroad. Investigations into data stored abroad often cause problems under international law. The purpose of this study is to provide guidelines on the original attitude of the system by comparatively analyzing the system and operation of Korea and Europe and the United States for legal issues in such investigations.

KEYWORDS

criminal investigation, computer data, jurisdiction, evidence collection, offshore application, national sovereignty.

Citation status

* References for papers published after 2023 are currently being built.

[journal] 방경휘 / 2022 / A Study on Extraterritorial Search and Seizure in Investigation Based on the Japanese Supreme Court’s Decision of February 1, Reiwa 3 / 법학논총 / 법학연구소 35(1) : 133~183

[journal] 송규영 / 2019 / A Study on the Law Enforcement’s Access to Overseas Data - Focusing on the Jurisdiction and the Data Preservation - / 저스티스 / 한국법학원 173 : 187~217

[journal] 이관희 / 2020 / A Study on Permissibility and Conditions of Extra-territorial Data Search / 디지털포렌식연구 / 한국디지털포렌식학회 14(2) : 169~178

[thesis] 이재윤 / 2020 / 클라우드 환경에서 역외 압수·수색에 관한 연구 / 성균관대학교 일반대학원

[journal] 이재윤 / 2019 / Research on the offshore search and seizure of Digital Evidence / 한국산업보안연구 / 한국산업보안연구학회 9(2) : 185~214

[journal] 이정민 / 2017 / A study of transborder access through lawfully obtained password -High Court Decision 2017.6.13.2017no23 and 2017.7.5.2017no146- / 비교형사법연구 / 한국비교형사법학회 19(3) : 117~147

[thesis] 천성덕 / 2019 / 遠隔地押收·搜索에 關한 標準節次硏究 : 實務的事例를 中心으로 / 성균관대학교 일반대학원

[journal] 전치홍 / 2018 / Extra-territorial seizure of digital evidence in USA / 형사소송 이론과 실무 / 한국형사소송법학회 10(2) : 91~122

[book] 山本草二 / 1994 / 国際法 / 有斐閣 : 231~

[book] 酒井啓亘ほか / 2011 / 国際法 / 有斐閣 : 85~

[book] 小寺彰 / 1998 / 国家管轄権国際法と国内法 / 勁草書房 : 343~344

[book] 小寺彰ほか / 2010 / 講義国際法 / 有斐閣 : 163~

[book] 山内由光 / 2012 / 実例刑事訴訟法Ⅰ / 青林書院 : 5~12

[other] 石井由梨佳 / 2017 / 越境犯罪の国際的規制 : 137~160

[book] 河村博ほか / 2018 / 概説サイバ一犯罪―法令解説と捜査・公判の実際 / 青林書院 : 157~

[book] 笹倉宏紀 / 2017 / 経済刑法―実務と理論 / 商事法務 : 571~

[book] 杉山治樹 / 1998 / 新実例刑事訴訟法 I / 青林書院 : 55~56

[other] 石井由梨佳 / 2017 / 越境犯罪の国際的規制 : 88~104

[journal] 杉山徳明 / 2012 / 『情報処理の高度化等に対処するための刑法等の一部を改正する法律』について(下) / 法曹時報 64(5) : 100~101

[book] 川出敏裕 / 2019 / 井上正仁先生古稀祝賀論文集 / 有斐閣 : 428~429

[journal] 山内由光 / 2017 / 検証許可状に基づき押収済みのパソコンから海外メ一ルサ一バに接続した捜査に重大な違法があるとして証拠が排除された事例 / 研修 / 誌友会事務局研修編集部 (832) : 13~

[journal] 指宿信 / 2019 / 越境するデ一タ,越境する捜索: 域外デ一タ取得をめぐる執行方式に関する欧米の立法動向 / Law & Technology (82) : 47~

[journal] 松平浩一 / 衆議院議員提出米 “クラウド法と個人情報保護法上の対応に関する質問に対する答弁書 / 内閣衆質 198(227)

[journal] 佐藤智晶 / 2018 / デ一タ利用に関する契約の周辺一海外同行,特に米国の連邦トレ一ド・シ一クレット保護法とCLOUD Actを中心に一 / 青山法学論集 60(3)

[book] 川出敏裕 / 2019 / 井上正仁先生古希祝賀論文集 / 有斐閣

[journal] 山内由光 / 2017 / 判例研究検証許可状に基づき押収済みのパソコンから海外メ一ルサ一バに接続した捜査に重大な違法があるとして証拠が排除された事例 / 研修 832

[journal] 四方光 / 2018 / 刑事裁判例批評(372) 収済みのパソコンから検証許可状に基づき海外メ一ルサ一バにリモ一トアクセスを行った操作に重大な違法があるとして証拠排除した事例 / 刑事法ジャ一ナル (58)

[journal] 洪恵子 / 2000 / 国際協力における双方可罰性の現代的意義について㈠ / 三重大学法経論叢 18(1)

[journal] Bert-Jaap Koops / 2014 / Cyberspace, the Cloud and Cross-Border Criminal Investigation: The Limits and Possibilities of International Law / Tilburg: Tilburg Institute for Law, Technology and Society : 61~62

[report] Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe / 2001 / Explanatory Report to the Convention on Cybercrime : 29~

[other] Council of Europe Cybercrime Convention Committee(T-CY) / 2012 / Transborder access and jurisdiction: What are the options? / Doc no T-CY (2012) 3 : 6~

[other] Council of Europe Cybercrime Convention Committee (T-CY) / 2016 / Cloud Evidence Group, Criminal justice access to data in the cloud: Recommendations : 9~

[confproc] Richard W / 2019 / Prospects for Transatlantic Cooperation on the Transfer of Electronic Evidence to Promotion Public Safety / Downing Delivers Remarksat the Academy of European Law Conference

[other] / EPDB-EDPS Joint Response to the LIBE Committee on the impact of the US Cloud Act on the Euro pean legal framework for personal data protection

[other] European Commission / Proposal for a DIRECTIVE of the EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT and of the COUNCIL laying down harmonised rules on the appointment of legal representatives for the purpose of gathering evidence in criminal proceedings COM/2018/226 final -2018/0107 (COD)

[other] European Parliament / Adequacy of the protection afforded by the EU-US Privacy Shield European Parliament resolution of 5 July 2018 on the adequacy of the protection afforded by the EU-US Privacy Shield, 2018/2645 (RSP)

[book] Frederick Alexander Mann / 1984 / 186 Recueildes Cours 9 : 47~49

[other] Michael N. Schmitt / 2017 / TALLINN MANUAL 2.0 on the INTERNATIONAL LAW APPLICABLE TOCYBER OPERATIONS : 11~

[journal] Paul Schwartz / 2018 / Legal Access to The Global Cloud / COLUM. L. REV 118 : 1721~1722

[other] / 2018 / Restatement(Fourth) of the Foreign Relations Law of the United States / AM. LAW INST : 407~413

[book] Robert J. Currie / 2017 / 54 CANADIAN YEARBOOK of INTERNATIONAL LAW 63 : 87~89

[report] Spoenle / 2010 / Cloud computing and cybercrime investigations: territoriality vs. the power of disposal? / Council of Europe

[other] / 1927 / S.S. Lotus (Fr. v. Turk., 1927 P.C.I.J. (ser.A) No.10 (Sep.7) : 18~19

[book] Ulrich Sieber / 2017 / 20MAX PLANCK YEARBOOK of UNITED NATIONS LAW 241 : 308~

[other] UNODC / 2013 / Comprehensive Study on Cybercrime : 217~218

[other] Yahoo! / 2015 / Hof van Cassatie van Belgi, 1 December 2015, Nr.P. 13.2082. N

[web] / https://rm.coe.int/16800cce5b / https://rm.coe.int/16800cce5b

[web] / http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2018-0315_EN.pdf / http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2018-0315_EN.pdf

[web] / http://jure.juridat.just.fgov.be/pdfapp/download_blob?idpdf=N-20151201-1 / http://jure.juridat.just.fgov.be/pdfapp/download_blob?idpdf=N-20151201-1

[web] / http://journals.sas.ac.uk/deeslr/article/viewFile/2310/2261 / http://journals.sas.ac.uk/deeslr/article/viewFile/2310/2261

[web] / https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?qid=1524129181403&uri=COM:2018:226:FIN / https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?qid=1524129181403&uri=COM:2018:226:FIN

[web] / http://www.law.go.kr/lsInfoP.do?lsiSeq=206000&efYd=20190625#J2:2 / http://www.law.go.kr/lsInfoP.do?lsiSeq=206000&efYd=20190625#J2:2

[web] / https://edpb.europa.eu/our-work-tools/our-documents/letters/epdb-edps-joint-res ponse-libe-committee-impact-us-cloud-act_en / https://edpb.europa.eu/our-work-tools/our-documents/letters/epdb-edps-joint-response-libe-committee-impact-us-cloud-act_en

[web] / http://www.law.go.kr/lsInfoP.do?lsiSeq=206009&efYd=20190625#0000 / http://www.law.go.kr/lsInfoP.do?lsiSeq=206009&efYd=20190625#0000

[web] / https://kcc.go.kr/download.do?fileSeq=48880 / https://kcc.go.kr/download.do?fileSeq=48880

[web] / https://www.scourt.go.kr/sjudge/1512108215099_150335.pdf / https://www.scourt.go.kr/sjudge/1512108215099_150335.pdf

[web] / http://library.scourt.go.kr/SCLIB_data/decision/20_2017Do9747.htm / http://library.scourt.go.kr/SCLIB_data/decision/20_2017Do9747.htm

[web] / https://www.domstol.no/globalassets/upload/hret/decisions-in-english-translation /hr-2019-610-a.pdf / https://www.domstol.no/globalassets/upload/hret/decisions-in-english-translation/hr-2019-610-a.pdf

[web] / https://www.unodc.org/documents/organized-crime/UNODC_CCPCJ_EG.4_2013/C YBERCRIME_STUDY_210213.pdf / https://www.unodc.org/documents/organized-crime/UNODC_CCPCJ_EG.4_2013/CYBERCRIME_STUDY_210213.pdf

[web] / https://www.justice.gov/opa/speech/deputy-assistant-attorney-general-richardw-downing-delivers-remarks-academy-european-law) / https://www.justice.gov/opa/speech/deputy-assistant-attorney-general-richardw-downing-delivers-remarks-academy-european-law)

[web] / https://rm.coe.int/t-cy-2019-19-protocol-tor-extensionchchair-note-v3/16809577ff / https://rm.coe.int/t-cy-2019-19-protocol-tor-extensionchchair-note-v3/16809577ff

[web] / https://rm.coe.int/CoERMPublicCommonSearchServices/DisplayDCTMContent?do cumentId=09000016802fa3df / https://rm.coe.int/CoERMPublicCommonSearchServices/DisplayDCTMContent?documentId=09000016802fa3df

[web] / https://www.congress.gov/115/bills/hr1625/BILLS-115hr1625enr.pdf#page=866 / https://www.congress.gov/115/bills/hr1625/BILLS-115hr1625enr.pdf#page=866

[web] / https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/17pdf/17-2_1824.pdf / https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/17pdf/17-2_1824.pdf

[web] / http://www.shugiin.go.jp/internet/itdb_shitsumon_pdf_t.nsf/html/shitsumon/pdfT/b198227.pdf/$File/b198227.pdf / http://www.shugiin.go.jp/internet/itdb_shitsumon_pdf_t.nsf/html/shitsumon/pdfT/b198227.pdf/$File/b198227.pdf

[web] / https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R45173.pdf / https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R45173.pdf

[web] / https://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/gaiko/treaty/pdfs/treaty159_4a.pdf / https://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/gaiko/treaty/pdfs/treaty159_4a.pdf

[web] / http://hakusyo1.moj.go.jp/jp/65/nfm/n65_2_2_6_3_1.html / http://hakusyo1.moj.go.jp/jp/65/nfm/n65_2_2_6_3_1.html

[web] / https://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/gaiko/soshiki/cyber/index.html / https://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/gaiko/soshiki/cyber/index.html

[other] / CLOUD Act Sec.103(b), 18 U.S.C. 2703(h)

[other] / 1945 / 75 U.S. v. Aluminum Co. of America, 148 F.2d 416

[other] / 2019 / Tidal Music AS v. The public prosecution authority, March 28, 2019, HR-2019-610-A, (Case No. 19-010640 STR-HRET)

[other] / 2018 / United States v. Microsoft Corp., 584 U.S._(2018)_ (per curiam)

KJCKorea
Journal Central

Legal Theory & Practice Review 2023 KCI Impact Factor : 1.03