본문 바로가기
  • Home

Assessing the Feasibility of Public-Lawization of Risk-Based Jeonse Deposit Return Guarantees — Focusing on Regulatory Characterization and a Partial Public-Law Framework -

  • Legal Theory & Practice Review
  • Abbr : LTPR
  • 2026, 14(1), pp.377~414
  • Publisher : The Korea Society for Legal Theory and Practice Inc.
  • Research Area : Social Science > Law
  • Received : January 26, 2026
  • Accepted : February 23, 2026
  • Published : February 28, 2026

Cho Jae Jin 1 Kwon, Kee Wook 1

1세명대학교

Accredited

ABSTRACT

This study asks whether HUG’s risk-based operation of the Jeonse Deposit Return Guarantee—premium differentiation and underwriting denials/restrictions—functions as a quasi-regulatory mechanism once linked to jeonse loans and effectively shaping market access and transaction terms. Using mainly normative legal analysis, it examines the fit with legality and rights-protection principles (legal reservation, clarity, proportionality, due process), the disposition-like nature of adverse underwriting decisions, and possible routes/standards of judicial review, while typologizing key market problems (access gaps, cost pass-through, protection gaps for vulnerable tenants). It then proposes a ‘partial public-law institutionalization’ model: legally ground and procedurally control core elements (key premium variables and grounds/procedures for denials/restrictions) while leaving detailed scoring models to professional autonomy. Finally, it combines this with gap-cushioning measures—public reinsurance/funds, targeted subsidies, and risk-reducing alternatives such as escrow and partial guarantees—to balance tenant protection, market stability, and sustainability.

Citation status

* References for papers published after 2024 are currently being built.